This clinical study was conducted to compare two different dental materials used in the treatment of children who have a condition called molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH). MIH affects the quality of the enamel in permanent molars and can cause sensitivity, pain, and rapid tooth breakdown. In this study, children between the ages of 8 and 13 who had MIH in at least two molars received two types of onlay restorations: one made from a hybrid composite block and the other from a hybrid ceramic block. Both restorations were designed and manufactured using a digital system called CAD/CAM, which allows for more precise and efficient dental treatment. Each child received both types of restorations-one on each side of the mouth-in a split-mouth design. The goal was to see how well each material worked over a period of six months. The restorations were evaluated by trained dentists using clinical criteria, and the children were also assessed for tooth sensitivity using a cold air test. The main purpose of this study was to find out which material provides better clinical performance and reduces tooth sensitivity more effectively.
Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) is a developmental enamel defect that primarily affects the first permanent molars and frequently the incisors. It is characterized by hypomineralized enamel with increased porosity, discoloration, and a high risk of post-eruptive enamel breakdown. Affected teeth often present with significant sensitivity, posing difficulties in achieving adequate anesthesia and effective bonding during restorative procedures. As a result, the management of MIH-affected molars in pediatric patients is both complex and clinically significant. This prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical study was designed to compare two different CAD/CAM materials used in semi-direct onlay restorations for the treatment of MIH-affected molars in children aged 8 to 13 years. The materials under investigation were a nano-hybrid composite block (Grandio blocs, VOCO) and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) hybrid ceramic block (VITA Enamic, VITA Zahnfabrik). The study enrolled 20 pediatric patients, each presenting with at least two permanent first molars affected by MIH (classified as score 2b/c or 4b/c according to the MIH-TNI criteria). Using a split-mouth design, each patient received both interventions-one molar restored with a hybrid composite block and the other with a hybrid ceramic block. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence. All procedures were carried out by a trained pediatric dentistry resident under rubber dam isolation, following a standardized adhesive protocol. The restorative process was completed in a single session and followed a fully digital workflow. Teeth were scanned intraorally using the CEREC system, and restorations were designed and milled chairside. Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) was applied prior to cementation. The internal surfaces of the restorations were prepared using appropriate surface treatments such as sandblasting or hydrofluoric acid etching followed by silane application, in accordance with the manufacturers' guidelines. Final cementation was performed using a dual-cure resin cement. Follow-up evaluations are planned at 6, 12, and 18 months post-operatively. At each time point, clinical assessments are conducted by two calibrated, blinded evaluators using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. These include evaluations of marginal adaptation, surface integrity, anatomical form, marginal discoloration, and the presence of secondary caries. Additionally, thermal sensitivity is assessed using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale to monitor changes in dentin hypersensitivity over time. This study aims to provide comparative data on the mid-term clinical performance of two innovative restorative materials applied in MIH-affected molars using a minimally invasive, digital workflow.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
This refers to restorations fabricated from nano-ceramic hybrid composite blocks via chairside CAD/CAM workflow and cemented to permanent molars affected by MIH (molar-incisor hypomineralization).
This refers to restorations fabricated from polymer-infiltrated hybrid ceramic blocks using a digital workflow, then cemented to MIH-affected permanent molars.
Marmara University, School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry. Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Yerleşkesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Başıbüyük Yolu 9/3 34854 Başıbüyük / Maltepe / İSTANBUL.
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Clinical performance of onlay restorations based on modified USPHS criteria
Assessment of the clinical acceptability of CAD/CAM-fabricated semi-direct onlay restorations using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria, including Surface luster/roughness, Surface and marginal staining, Color match, Anatomic form, Fracture of restoration, Marginal adaptation, Patient's view, Postop. hypersensitivity and tooth vitality, Recurrence of erosion/caries and Fracture of tooth Scores: Acceptable: 1. Perfect 2. Good 3. Acceptable Unacceptable (failed): 4. Bad 5. Gross
Time frame: 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment
Dentin hypersensitivity assessed by the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale
Evaluation of thermal sensitivity in restored MIH-affected molars using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. The test involves applying a standardized air stimulus to the tooth surface and scoring the response on a scale from 0 to 3. Ordinal (Schiff scale: 0 = no response, 1 = response but no request to stop, 2 = response with request to stop, 3 = painful response)
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months post-treatment
Intra-examiner and inter-examiner agreement on clinical evaluation criteria
Measurement of the consistency and reliability between two calibrated evaluators in assessing clinical performance using modified USPHS criteria. Agreement will be calculated using kappa statistics. Statistical agreement (Cohen's Kappa coefficient) Assessment of the clinical acceptability of CAD/CAM-fabricated semi-direct onlay restorations using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria, including Surface luster/roughness, Surface and marginal staining, Color match, Anatomic form, Fracture of restoration, Marginal adaptation, Patient's view, Postop. hypersensitivity and tooth vitality, Recurrence of erosion/caries and Fracture of tooth Scores: Acceptable: 1. Perfect 2. Good 3. Acceptable Unacceptable (failed): 4. Bad 5. Gross
Time frame: At each clinical follow-up visit (6, 12, and 18 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.