Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are life-threatening conditions often associated with hyperammonemia, hepatic encephalopathy, and multi-organ dysfunction. Ammonia plays a central role in the pathogenesis of cerebral edema and neurotoxicity. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been shown to effectively reduce serum ammonia levels and may improve transplant-free survival in ALF. However, the optimal dialysis dose for ammonia clearance and neurological recovery remains uncertain. This randomized, multicenter clinical trial aims to compare conventional-dose (25-35 mL/kg/h) versus high-dose (45-55 mL/kg/h) CRRT in patients with ALF or ACLF and arterial ammonia \>72 μmol/L. The primary outcome is the number of coma- and delirium-free days. Secondary outcomes include ammonia clearance and additional parameters of cerebral function monitoring.
Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are critical conditions characterized by rapid deterioration in hepatic function, coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, and multi-organ failure. Elevated serum ammonia levels are frequently observed in these patients and are strongly associated with cerebral dysfunction, including coma and delirium. Ammonia contributes to the development of brain edema through mechanisms involving astrocyte swelling, oxidative stress, and altered neurotransmission. Rapid and effective reduction of ammonia is a key therapeutic target in the management of these patients. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly used in critically ill patients with ALF or ACLF, particularly in those with hyperammonemia. While CRRT is effective in lowering ammonia levels, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal dialysis dose to maximize ammonia clearance and improve neurological outcomes. Observational data and small interventional studies suggest a potential benefit of higher CRRT doses in terms of ammonia removal and clinical improvement, but robust evidence from randomized trials is lacking. This study is a randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial designed to compare the effects of two different CRRT dosing strategies on cerebral function in patients with ALF or ACLF and arterial ammonia levels \>72 μmol/L. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive either conventional-dose CRRT (25-35 mL/kg/h) or high-dose CRRT (45-55 mL/kg/h). All other aspects of clinical management will follow current standard-of-care protocols. The primary endpoint is the number of coma- and delirium-free days during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes include the degree of ammonia clearance, time to normalization of ammonia levels, filter lifespan, need for rescue therapies (e.g., liver transplantation), mortality, and neurological function monitoring using noninvasive technologies. The study seeks to generate high-quality evidence to guide CRRT dosing decisions in the context of hyperammonemia due to liver failure. Protocol Amendment - Change in Stratification Ratio The original protocol assumed a balanced enrollment of patients with Acute Liver Failure (ALF) and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF), with an intended 1:1 distribution across both strata. However, after initiating recruitment and observing actual prevalence patterns at participating centers, it became evident that the number of eligible patients with ACLF significantly exceeds that of ALF. In response, the study protocol was amended to reflect a revised stratification ratio of 1:5 (ALF: ACLF). Within each stratum, randomization to treatment arms (conventional-dose vs. high-dose CRRT) remains 1:1. This adjustment enhances recruitment feasibility and reflects the real-world distribution of liver failure phenotypes, without altering the study's scientific objectives, eligibility criteria, or outcome measures.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
152
Continuous renal replacement therapy administered at an effluent dose of 45-55 mL/kg/h using standard equipment and protocols for critically ill patients with ALF or ACLF and hyperammonemia.
Continuous renal replacement therapy administered at an effluent dose of 25-35 mL/kg/h using standard equipment and protocols for critically ill patients with ALF or ACLF and hyperammonemia.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Number of coma- and delirium-free days
The number of days during the first 28 days after randomization in which the patient is alive and free of coma or delirium, assessed using standardized neurological evaluation tools such as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 28 post-randomization
Ammonia clearance at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours
Serial arterial ammonia levels will be measured to calculate the reduction in ammonia concentration from baseline at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after initiation of CRRT.
Time frame: Baseline to 72 hours
Length of hospital stay
Total number of days from hospital admission to discharge
Time frame: Up to 90 days
28-day mortality
All-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization
Time frame: 28 days post randomization
90-day mortality
All-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization.
Time frame: 90 days post-randomization
Number of ventilator-free days within 28 days
Number of days within the first 28 days post-randomization during which the patient is alive and not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
Time frame: 28 days post-randomization
Incidence of safety outcomes, such as hypophosphatemia, dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, and rapid correction of hyponatremia
Adverse events will be monitored and recorded during CRRT, including laboratory-confirmed hypophosphatemia (phosphate \<2.5 mg/dL), clinical signs of dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, and serum sodium correction \>10 mmol/L in 24 hours.
Time frame: From CRRT initiation up to 7 days or until therapy discontinuation
Improvement in cerebral compliance
Cerebral compliance will be assessed using the Brain4care noninvasive monitoring system. Improvement will be defined as normalization or favorable trend in intracranial compliance waveform patterns compared to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 28 post-randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.