Antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation commonly results in allograft failure and death in spite of current therapeutic regimens. We are testing the safety and tolerability of the addition of a novel immunosuppressive medication to routine treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. Future studies will be needed to assess efficacy if this study demonstrates safety
Long-term outcomes after lung transplantation remain disappointing, and the median survival is 6.7 years. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death beyond the first year after lung transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is increasingly recognized after lung transplantation, is caused by donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to mismatched human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and frequently results in CLAD and death. Recent multicenter studies using intensive monitoring for AMR report an incidence over 25%. Treatment for AMR has generally focused on antibody depletion and prevention of additional antibody development. Various combinations have been used including high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), Rituximab, Carfilzomib, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), and plasma exchange (PLEX). However, there have been no randomized controlled trials to guide management, and outcomes after AMR are dismal. One-year allograft survival after AMR is approximately 50%, and 2-year survival is only 20%. IL-6, initially identified as B-cell stimulating factor 2 (BSF-2), is a pleiotropic cytokine that drives deleterious inflammatory, alloimmune, and fibrogenic responses. In conjunction with other cytokines, IL-6 is responsible for normal antibody production and is critical for the induction of follicular helper T cells as well as the production of IL-21 which regulates immunoglobulin synthesis. IL-6 is also crucial for B-cell differentiation into plasmablasts and for enhancing plasmablast survival. These characteristics make IL-6 an especially attractive cytokine to target in the management of AMR. Human studies examining the role of IL-6 signaling blockade in the management of AMR after kidney transplantation have shown promising results, even in refractory cases. Preliminary experience with use of IL-6 signaling blockade in a very small number of lung transplant recipients with AMR has been encouraging. The principal hypothesis for this study is that IL-6 signaling blockade added to routine immunosuppressive treatment for AMR will improve clinical outcomes. However, evaluating the safety of this approach is necessary before examining efficacy in larger clinical trials because infections are the most common serious adverse events associated with IL-6 signaling blockade and a common cause of death at all timepoints after lung transplantation. This study is a Phase 1 clinical trial using Siltuximab, a monoclonal antibody to IL-6, in addition to routine immunosuppressive therapy for AMR to examine safety and define the optimal dose for the treatment of AMR. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints include pharmacodynamics and functional biological measures relevant to AMR (e.g., DSA, cell-free DNA). Data from this trial will inform the design of a future Phase 2 clinical trial that assesses efficacy. Carefully designed and implemented clinical trials are necessary to improve outcomes after lung transplantation.
Interleukin-6 blockade
Siltuximab placebo IV
Washington University School, of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Utah
Saint Lake City, Utah, United States
RECRUITINGIncidence of CTCAE ≥ grade 3
The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of Siltuximab added to routine immunosuppressive treatment for AMR after lung transplantation. The dose of siltuximab (11mg/kg or 5.5 mg/kg) with the least side effect profile will be use for future trials of siltuximab in antibody mediated rejection in lung transplantation.
Time frame: From Randomization to Day 90.
incidence of CTCAE ≥ grade 3
Time frame: during a period of 180 days after randomization
serum high-sensitivity CRP
Pharmacodynamic measure of Il-6 pathway blockade.
Time frame: Up to 90 and 180 days after randomization
Blood Sultiximab levels
pharmacokinetic measure
Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomization
Clearance of donor specific antibodies
Time frame: From randomization to day 180
Infections
Confirmed bacterial, CMV (defined as a positive blood viral load ≥ 200 IU/mL), mold, mycobacterial, community-acquired respiratory viral infection (each assessed independently), or other opportunistic infection
Time frame: Between randomization and day 180
Change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time frame: between randomization and day 180
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Time frame: between randomization and day 180
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
30
Development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction
Development of probable CLAD according to the 2019 ISHLT criteria
Time frame: between randomization and day 180
Allograft survival
Allograft survival defined as death or undergoing re-transplantation
Time frame: between randomization and day 180
Hyperuricemia
Blood uric acid \> 7 mg/dL
Time frame: between randomization and day 180
Hyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia requiring the initiation or dose increase of medical therapy
Time frame: between randomization and day 180