This phase III trial compares the effect of adding panitumumab to standard chemotherapy (with nanoliposomal Irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil \[5-FU\] or irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-FU or nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) versus standard chemotherapy alone in treating patients with KRAS wild type (WT) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that cannot be removed by sugery (unresectable) or that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Chemotherapy drugs, such as nanoliposomal irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-FU, irinotecan, nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Adding panitumumab to standard chemotherapy may be effective in treating patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic KRAS WT pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between participants with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS wild type (WT) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) randomized to panitumumab plus second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy (5FU- or gemcitabine-based) versus chemotherapy alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment arms. II. To compare the overall response rate (ORR) (ORR, including confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] 1.1 criteria) between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease. III. To compare disease control rate (DCR) (DCR, defined as ORR + stable disease rate \[SD\]) between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease. IV. To evaluate the frequency and severity of toxicity within each treatment arm. V. To compare duration of response (DoR) between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease. ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES: I. To compare OS and PFS between treatment arms in the subgroup of participants with MAPK negative cancers, that is, cancers without any known mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway molecular alterations (type 1 or 2 BRAF mutations; BRAF, NRG1, ROS1, FGFR1-3 and RAF1 fusions; EGFR, KRAS, and FGFR1-3 amplification). II. To compare ORR in participants with MAPK negative cancers between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease. PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITIERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (CTCAE) OBJECTIVES: I. To compare health-related quality of life (QOL) by treatment arm at 8 weeks after randomization, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) total score. II. To compare the impact of treatment toxicity by treatment arm at 8 weeks after randomization, measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Item GP5. III. To compare changes from baseline in QOL and impact of treatment toxicity between treatment arms using FACT-G total score and FACIT Item GP5 to 24 weeks after randomization. IV. To assess patient-reported symptoms by treatment arm using selected patient reported outcome (PRO)-CTCAE items including gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and constitutional symptoms of pain and fatigue. BANKING OBJECTIVE: I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A: Patients receive panitumumab intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15. Patients also receive either nanoliposomal irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 15, leucovorin IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 15, and 5-FU IV over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or irinotecan IV over 90 minutes, leucovorin IV over 90-120 minutes on days 1 and 15, 5-FU IV bolus over 5-15 minutes on days 1 and 15 and 5FU IV continuous over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or nab-paclitaxel IV over 30 minutes, and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan and blood sample collection throughout the study. ARM B: Patients receive either nanoliposomal irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 15, leucovorin IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 15, and 5-FU IV over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or irinotecan IV over 90 minutes, leucovorin IV over 90-120 minutes on days 1 and 15, 5-FU IV bolus over 5-15 minutes on days 1 and 15 and 5FU IV continuous over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or nab-paclitaxel IV over 30 minutes, and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan and blood sample collection throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 3 years post randomization.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
94
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo CT scan
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Ancillary studies
Overall survival (OS)
Analysis of OS will be conducted in all eligible participants according to the intent-to-treat principle using a 1-sided stratified log rank test.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Objective response rate (ORR)
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Will be compared across treatment arms via Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Disease control rate
Will be compared across treatment arms via Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Duration of response (DoR)
The distributions of DoR will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Progression free survival (PFS)
The distributions of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration (per RECIST 1.1), or death due to any cause, up to 3 years
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last study treatment
OS in participants with MAPK negative cancers
The distributions of OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
PFS in participants with MAPK negative cancers
The distributions of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration (per RECIST 1.1), or death due to any cause, up to 3 years
ORR in participants with MAPK negative cancers
Will be compared across treatment arms via Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.