The proposal of this study is to compare inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S system with intravenous sedation with propofol. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD device (Sedana Medical, Uppsala, Sweden) or intravenous propofol. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days at 28 days after randomization.
Justification: Isoflurane has recently emerged as an attractive alternative for intensive care unit (ICU) sedation. Due to their favorable pharmaco-kinetic and dynamic profile, this agent has been progressively introduced into clinical practice. Isoflurane has proven to be non-inferior to propofol in terms of efficacy and safety and it has been suggested that it may facilitate ventilator weaning. However, no differences in length of mechanical ventilation were found. These studies have focused on short sedation durations. In fact, long-term effects and outcomes associated with isoflurane for ICU sedation are not yet fully understood. Hypothesis: Inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S system in critically ill patients leads to a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation at 28 days and a reduced length of ICU stay compared to intravenous sedation with propofol. Main objective: To compare the number of ventilator-free days at day 28 post-randomization between critically ill patients receiving sedation with isoflurane versus those receiving intravenous sedation with propofol in critically ill patients expected to require more than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation. Key secondary objective: To compare the number of ICU-free days at day 28 post-randomization in both treatment arms. Secondary objectives: To compare time to extubation after sedation withdrawal, efficacy in maintaining a target level of sedation, compare the percentage of patients requiring one or more additional hypnotics, compare the incidence and duration of delirium at day 28, assess mental, cognitive, and quality of life status at 90 days post-hospital discharge between both treatment groups. Methodology: Phase IV, low-intervention, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis including mechanically ventilated patients expected to require a minimum of 48 hours of mechanical ventilation with a RASS score between -3 and -5. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive inhaled sedation with isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD device (Sedana Medical, Uppsala, Sweden) or intravenous sedation with propofol. A total of 620 patients will be included from a pool of 22 participating centers.
Study Type
Inhaled sedation with isoflurane via Sedaconda ACD-S
Intravenous sedation with Propofol 20 mg/ml
Hospital Vega Baja
Orihuela, Alicante, Spain
Ventilator-free days at day 28 from randomization
Number of days between randomization and day 28 during which the patient is alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients who die before day 28, or who remain on mechanical ventilation at day 28, are assigned zero ventilator-free days.
Time frame: From randomization until day 28
Key secondary objective: ICU-free days at day 28 post-randomization
Number of days between randomization and day 28 during which the patient is alive and free from the ICU. Patients who die before day 28, or remain in the ICU on day 28, are assigned zero ICU-free days.
Time frame: From randomization until day 28
Time to extubation
Mean number of hours from sedation withdrawal to successful extubation.
Time frame: From randomization until day 28
Administration of rescue sedation
Number of patients requiring the addition of one or more hypnotics
Time frame: From randomization until day 28
Sedation efficacy
Difference between the target sedation level and the actual measured level using Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS). Possible RASS score ranges from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative)
Time frame: From randomization until extubation or day 28
Number of Participants With Delirium
Number of patients with delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method in ICU (CAM-ICU)
Time frame: From randomization until extubation or day 28
Mortality
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
620
Hospital Universitario Doctor José Molina Orosa
Arrecife, Lanzarote-Canary Islands, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Galdakao-Usansolo Ospitalea
Galdakao, Vizcaya, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Universitario de Albacete
Albacete, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitario de Bellvitge
Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitario Valle de Hebron
Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitario de Jaen
Jaén, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Madrid, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 12 more locations
All cause mortality at 60 days from randomization
Time frame: From randomization to day 60
Number of Participants With Psychological disorders
Psychological status assessed using: 1.- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). score of 8 or greater on the anxiety or depression subscale is used to identify symptoms of clinically significant anxiety or depression. 2.- Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R), a self-report measure designed to assess the severity of post-traumatic stress disorder. Optimal screening threshold established as 1.6 (Consensus Conference on Prediction and Identification of Long-Term Impairments After Critical Illness. Crit Care Med 2020)
Time frame: at 90 days of hospital discharge
Number of Participants With Cognitive Disorders
Cognitive status assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. Total score ranges from zero to 30. Mild cognitive impairment: 18-25, moderate: 10-17, and severe: less than 10 (Consensus Conference on Prediction and Identification of Long-Term Impairments After Critical Illness. Crit Care Med 2020)
Time frame: at 90 days of hospital discharge
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Number of participants who experience at least one adverse event of special interest, deemed by the investigators to be related to the administered hypnotic, including events of mild, moderate, severe intensity, as well as serious adverse events
Time frame: From randomization to day 28