This RCT compares three drainage approaches after minimally invasive esophagectomy (chest tube + thoracic mediastinal drainage tube, thoracic, and abdominal mediastinal drainage tube) to evaluate perioperative outcomes, addressing current evidence gaps in pain and complication profiles.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
75
Transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Transperitoneal mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Chest tube insertion combined with transthoracic mediastinal drainage was performed for postoperative management of the patient.
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RECRUITINGPostoperative Pain Scores
Pain scores were assessed based on the visual analog scale according to the World Health Organization guidelines, in which 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst possible pain. We also recorded and evaluated maximum daily pain scores when pain caused by the mediastinal drainage tube incision.
Time frame: Pain scores were recorded at different times during the postoperative period when the patients were quiet and active (at 7 AM, 11 AM, 3 PM, and 7 PM) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 4.
Postoperative complications
Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak, major pulmonary complications, and major abdominal complications. Pleural effusion was defined as a drainage volume of greater than 800 mL. Pneumothorax was defined by a distance of greater than 3 cm between the apex of the lung and the top of the ribcage on chest radiography.
Time frame: Postoperative complications from posoperative day 1 to postoperative month 3
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.