The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and patient experience of an integrated care pathway combining rapid antiretroviral (ART) initiation with BIC/FTC/TAF and peer navigation for treatment naïve newly-diagnosed or relinking HIV-infected PWIDs, in terms of viral suppression rates, adverse events and patient-reported health outcomes (PROs). The main objectives of the study are the assessment of: * The viral suppression rates at 24 weeks after the rapid initiation of ART with BIC/FTC/TAF coupled with secured peer-navigation in adult HIV-positive PWID who are treatment-naïve or re-linking to care * The safety and tolerability of BIC/FTC/TAF in the specific context of rapid ART initiation in adult PWID who are treatment-naïve or re-linking to care from baseline until Week 24. Patients will receive their medication according to the standard of care and will visit the clinic as usual. No extra visits or extra lab tests will be performed.
Taking into account the increased rates of new cases of HIV infection among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Greece, it is proposed the conduct of the observational study with the aim to assess whether clinical outcomes can be improved by the implementation of rapid ART initiation in newly diagnosed HIV-positive PWIDs and re-linking to care previously diagnosed HIV-positive PWIDs with a suitable medication, such as BIC/FTC/TAF, combined with peer-navigation support that can help the afflicted patients overcome social barriers and challenges. Therefore, this pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and patient experience of an integrated care pathway combining rapid ART initiation with BIC/FTC/TAF and peer navigation for treatment naïve newly-diagnosed or relinking HIV-infected PWIDs, in terms of viral suppression rates, adverse events and patient-reported health outcomes (PROs). Given the armamentarium of potent ART regimens, HIV infection has been transformed from a terminal illness into a chronic condition, thus, evaluating the impact of ARTs from patients' perspective is increasingly used \[17\]. The results of this study are expected to contribute towards informed health policy practices, accelerating and ameliorating care and providing the basis to curb the HIV epidemic and bringing us closer to its end.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
37
Rapid antiretroviral treatment initiation with BIC/FTC/TAF
General Hospital of Athens "EVAGGELISMOS"
Athens, Attica, Greece
General Hospital of Athens "LAIKO"
Athens, Attica, Greece
University General Hospital "ATTIKON"
Athens, Attica, Greece
The percentage of subjects with a viral load of <50 copies/ml
The measurement is performed at Week 24 according to FDA snapshot analysis
Time frame: Week 24 after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event
The record of adverse events (related or not related to study treatment) grade 3 or 4
Time frame: From baseline until Week 24 after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects with viral load <50 copies/ml at Week 48
The measurement is performed after Week 24 according to FDA snapshot analysis
Time frame: At Week 48 after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects with viral load <50 copies/ml other time points
The measurements are performed in several time points after treatment initiation
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 after treatment initiation
The difference in the percentage of subjects with a viral load of <50 copies/ml at Weeks 24 and 48
The difference in the percentage of subjects with a viral load of \<50 copies/ml will be compared to a historic matched control group
Time frame: At Week 24 and 48 after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects experiencing a grade 3-4 adverse event after Week 24
The record of adverse events (related or not related to study treatment) grade 3 or 4 after Week 24
Time frame: From Week 24 to Week 48 after treatment initiation
The mean change of CD4 count, CD4 (%) and CD4/CD8 ratio
The evaluation of the change of CD4 count, CD4 (%) and CD4/CD8 ratio from treatment initiation to Week 48
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48 after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects retained in care at Weeks 24 and 48
The percentage of subjects that remain in the treatment at Weeks 24 and 48, after treatment initiation
Time frame: At Weeks 24 and 48, after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects lost to follow-up
The percentage of subjects that did not remain in the study until Week 48
Time frame: From treatment initiation to Week 48
The percentage of subjects with linkage and retention in OST programs
The monitoring of subjects that remained in the OST care until completion of Week 48, after treatment initiation.
Time frame: At Weeks 12, 24, and 48
The percentage of adherent patients during the study
Self-assessed adherence to study treatment at several time points during the study by using SMAQ questionnaire
Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
The percentage of subjects with protocol-defined virologic failure at Week 12 and 24
The percentage of subjects with protocol-defined virologic failure i.e., plasma HIV-RNA \>400 copies/ml at Week 12 confirmed on a second sample drawn 15-21 days later or 2 consecutive plasma HIV-RNA \>50 copies/ml within 15-21days as of Week 24 at Week 12 and 24
Time frame: At Weeks 12 and 24, after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects requiring discontinuation/modification of treatment
The percentage of subjects requiring discontinuation/modification of treatment with BIC/FTC/TAF throughout the study up to Week 48 due to: (i) Baseline resistance to one of the study drugs, and (ii) Adverse events.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48, after treatment initiation
The percentage of subjects harbouring a virus developing resistance
The percentage of subjects harbouring a virus developing resistance associated mutations at the time of protocol-defined virological failure until Week 48
Time frame: From the point of virological failure to Week 48
The percentage of subjects accepting initiation of ART and remaining in the study to Week 48
The percentage of subjects 1) accepting initiation of ART within 7 days from first clinic visit through standard interview (according to EACS guidelines) and 2) accepting initiation of ART within 7 days from first clinic visit through standard interview (according to EACS guidelines) and remaining adherent to ART at Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 48.
Time frame: From treatment initiation to Week 48
The number and type of concomitant medications
The number and type of concomitantly received medications from Day 0 and up to Week 48.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 48
Changes in the scores of EuroQol Group 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire
The change in PRO scores EuroQol Group 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) from baseline at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. This evaluate the quality of life for several activities like mobility, self care etc. There is a scale from 0 to 100, 0 is for the worst health and 100 is for the best health.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Changes in the scores of HIV- Symptom Index (HIV-SI) questionnaire
The HIV Symptom Index (HIV-SI) is a concise, validated questionnaire developed to assess overall symptom distress in people living with HIV, as well as to capture clinically relevant symptom clusters associated with the condition. Patient symptom distress is quantified by evaluating changes in Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) scores derived from the HIV-SI, enabling effective monitoring of symptom burden over time.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
Changes in the scores of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
The change in PRO scores in TSQM relative to Week 4 at Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. This questionnaire evaluates the level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the medication that a patient is taking during the clinical study. The scale is from 1 to 7, from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied, respectively.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 48
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.