This research aims to examine the effect of the Six Thinking Hats Technique application on empathic thinking, critical thinking motivation and problem solving skills in nursing students. In the study, which will be conducted with a pre-test-post-test control group experimental design, the contribution of case discussions made with the Six Thinking Hats Technique to the cognitive and emotional skills of the students will be evaluated.
Nursing education is a dynamic process where theoretical knowledge and clinical practices are integrated; critical thinking, clinical decision-making and problem-solving skills are systematically developed. In this process, in the rapidly changing information society, it is of great importance that nursing students are trained not only as individuals who can access information, but also as professionals who can analyze, interpret information, develop alternative solutions and think in multiple ways. The six thinking hats technique, which aims to develop multi-dimensional thinking skills in nursing students within a systematic structure, is considered an effective teaching method that supports cognitive and emotional development. Within the scope of this technique, it is aimed for individuals to evaluate events and situations in multiple dimensions through six different colored hats, each of which represents a specific way of thinking, such as emotional evaluation, critical thinking, impartial analysis, optimistic perspective, creative thinking and process management.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
90
A total of 6 sessions of thinking training were given once a week for 6 weeks.
No intervention was made to this group.
KTO Karatay University
Konya, Karatay, Turkey (Türkiye)
Problem solving ability
Students' problem solving skills will be assessed using the Problem Solving Inventory. Total scores will be compared. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 32, and the highest score is 192.
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after intervention
Critical thinking ability
This scale was developed to provide information about motivation for a specific critical thinking task. The scale consists of 19 items, numbered on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 6. Participants are expected to respond by circling the appropriate option for each statement, ranging from 1 to 6 (1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree"). These statements express the expectation that each participant will think critically and rigorously (expectation) and the value they place on this type of thinking (value). These statements also include the perceived importance and usefulness of detailed thinking, the sacrifices they will make for this type of thinking, and the interest it generates in them. The scale does not contain reverse items. To score the scale, each question is first assigned a value ranging from 1 to 6. The total score for each subscale is then calculated and divided by the number of items to obtain the mean score. This process is applied separately for the five subscale
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.