This randomised controlled trial will evaluate the effects of a 9-week multi-component group-based cycling programme (Cycle Nation) versus a standard single cycle training session on self-reported cycling, health and wellbeing outcomes. Participants are adults that do not regularly cycle, who will be randomly allocated to each arm of the study. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post-programme, and at 12 months from baseline. Cost effectiveness will be assessed, and a process evaluation will be conducted.
Cycling improves physical and mental health, lowering risks of major diseases and reducing stress while enhancing wellbeing and fitness. It is a time-efficient way to increase physical activity and, when replacing motorised transport, reduces air pollution, carbon emissions, and traffic congestion. However, cycling participation in the UK remains low; only 10% of adults cycle at least weekly. This is a missed opportunity to enhance population health, lower health service costs, reduce environmental impact, and improve health related quality of life. Evidence suggests that over 50% of UK adults are interested in cycling more, therefore the potential to increase cycling is substantial. Non-cyclists report numerous barriers, spanning the individual, social, and environmental factors of the socio-ecological model. While improvements to cycling infrastructure can address some environmental barriers, they alone are insufficient to drive substantial increases in cycling. While many organisations offer standard single or short-term cycling sessions, these often address isolated components rather than taking an integrated approach. In contrast, Cycle Nation is an integrated group-based 9-week multi-component intervention, targeting multiple individual and social barriers over a sustained period to maximise effectiveness. Initially co-developed and piloted in collaboration with British Cycling and HSBC-UK as a workplace programme for employees, it has since been adapted for community settings in Manchester and Glasgow. Findings of these studies have demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and short-term effectiveness. However, Cycle Nation has not yet been rigorously tested in a powered randomised controlled trial (RCT), nor had its long-term effectiveness or cost-effectiveness evaluated. This is a pragmatic, two-arm RCT to assess the effect of the Cycle Nation programme in comparison to a single cycling training session. The interventions will be delivered by community-based cycling delivery partners across Glasgow, UK, with up to six organisations delivering the Cycle Nation programme (intervention) and one delivering the standard single introduction to road cycling session offered by Cycling Scotland (comparison). The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of the Cycle Nation programme versus a standard single session on the proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 months. Secondary objectives are to a) to evaluate the effect of the Cycle Nation programme versus a standard cycling session on self-reported health and wellbeing at 12 months, b) to evaluate the within-trial cost-effectiveness of the Cycle Nation programme at 12 months (and longer pending within trial findings), c) to assess how (well) Cycle Nation is delivered and examine how the core causal mechanisms function, and d) to determine how contextual factors contribute to variations in outcome and engagement with the Cycle Nation intervention.
Participants will be asked to attend nine weekly 90-minute face-to-face sessions, delivered by trained facilitators at community cycling organisations. Sessions include off road cycling skills and on-road group rides, behaviour change techniques (e.g. goal setting), and bicycle maintenance training. Two extra group rides will be offered during the programme for additional practice, along with two catch-up sessions at the end for those who missed any content. Participants will be added to a WhatsApp group to encourage peer communication. Bicycles, helmets, and locks will be loaned to participants for 10-12 weeks to support participation.
Participants will be asked to participate in Cycling Scotland's 'Introduction to On-Road Cycling' a single 2-2.5-hour session that is offered as standard. The session covers key cycling skills such as hazard awareness, road positioning, and communicating with other road users. Activities are tailored to participants' needs and may include navigating junctions, using shared infrastructure, and performing U-turns. Bicycles and helmets will be provided for the session.
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGProportion of participants cycling (for any purpose)
Change in number (proportion) of participants cycling (for any purpose) over past four weeks at 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 months follow-up
Proportion of participants cycling (for any purpose)
Change in number (proportion) of participants cycling (for any purpose) over past four weeks at 12-weeks follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Number of cycling journeys (for any purpose)
Change in the number of cycling journeys (for any purpose) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12-weeks and 12-months follow-up
Number of cycling journeys (leisure)
Change in the number of cycling journeys (for leisure) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Number of cycling journeys (commuting)
Change in the number of cycling journeys (for commuting) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Number of cycling journeys (errands)
Change in the number of cycling journeys (for errands) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of weekly cycling (for any purpose)
Change in total duration (minutes) of weekly cycling (for any purpose) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
268
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of weekly cycling (leisure)
Change in total duration (minutes) of weekly cycling (for leisure) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of weekly cycling (commuting)
Change in total duration (minutes) of weekly cycling (for commuting) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of weekly cycling (errands)
Change in total duration (minutes) of weekly cycling (for errands) over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Number of private car journeys
Change in time of private car journeys over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Number of taxi journeys
Change in the number of taxi journeys over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of taxi journeys
Change in total duration (minutes) of weekly taxi journeys over past four weeks at 12-weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Number of public transport journeys
Change in the number of weekly public transport journeys over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of public transport journeys
Change in total duration (minutes) of weekly public transport journeys over past four weeks at 12-weeks and at 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Number of walking journeys
Change in the number of walking journeys over past four weeks at 12 weeks and at 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Total duration of walking journeys
Change in total duration (minutes) of walking journeys over past four weeks at 12-weeks and at 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Perception of cycling safety
Change in perception of cycling safety at 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Perceptions of environment
Change in perception of environment at 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Confidence to cycle
Change in confidence to cycle at 12 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Motivation for cycling
Change in motivation (intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation for exercise) using the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2) at 12 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Self-esteem
Change in self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire) at 12 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Vitality
Change in vitality score (Subjective Vitality Scale) at 12 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Health related quality of life
Change in health-related quality of life score (EQ-5D-5 L) at 12 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up
Capability wellbeing
Change in capability wellbeing score (ICECAP-A) at 12 weeks and 12 month
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks and 12 months follow-up