The aim of the SMART-CARE trial is to compare clinical outcomes between coronary CT angiography (CCTA) versus standard care as follow-up strategies in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Advancements in drug-eluting stents, physiology-guided treatment decisions, intravascular imaging-guided procedural optimization, and adjunctive medical therapy have significantly improved prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, high-risk patients-particularly those with complex coronary artery lesions or high-risk clinical conditions such as acute myocardial infarction with or without cardiogenic shock at presentation, diabetes mellitus which requires medical treatment (oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin), end-stage renal disease under dialysis, or multi-vascular disease-continue to have a significantly higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events. In this regard, meticulous follow-up, including periodic assessment of clinical and functional status, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), and secondary prevention strategies are important, and current guidelines strongly recommend these measures as a Class I recommendation. However, recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that high-risk patients with complex coronary artery disease or high-risk clinical conditions still experience a continuous increase in adverse cardiovascular events despite optimal secondary prevention. This underscores the need for an optimized surveillance strategy to improve long-term prognosis. Despite the emphasis on GDMT and secondary prevention in current guidelines, the most effective surveillance strategy after PCI remains uncertain. Existing recommendations primarily address secondary prevention and provide only limited guidance on surveillance for patients with previous coronary revascularization. Based on multiple randomized controlled trials, current guidelines do not recommend routine non-invasive stress testing or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic patients receiving optimized GDMT (Class III, Level of Evidence B-R). However, this recommendation lacks direct evidence evaluating CCTA as a surveillance strategy after PCI. In patients with prior coronary revascularization, CCTA is currently recommended for assessing bypass graft or stent patency only in symptomatic patients (Class IIa), with limited supporting evidence (Level of Evidence B in ESC guidelines and Level of Evidence B-NR in ACC/AHA guidelines). Notably, the SCOT-HEART trial demonstrated that a CCTA-based treatment strategy was superior to standard care, which relied on clinical and functional assessment along with as-needed non-invasive stress testing, in reducing a composite outcome of coronary heart disease death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. This suggests that a surveillance strategy incorporating CCTA may lead to improved subsequent management decisions, such as preemptive ischemia-driven revascularization or intensified medical therapy, potentially reducing ischemic cardiovascular events and mortality compared to standard guideline-recommended care. To address this critical gap in clinical practice, we designed the Smart Angioplasty Research Team-Coronary CT Angiography versus Standard Care as Follow-up Strategies in High-Risk Patients after PCI (SMART-CARE) trial. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a CCTA-based surveillance strategy on clinical outcomes compared with standard guideline-directed follow-up in high-risk patients who have undergone PCI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
3,500
In the surveillance by CCTA group, patients will be evaluated by CCTA at 1 year from index hospitalization. CCTA will be done according to current acquisition guidelines. Downstream management according to the results from CCTA will be performed under recommendations from current guidelines.
SoonChunHyang University Hospital Bucheon
Time to first event of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
MACE is a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome leading to an urgent revascularization, or stent thrombosis
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
All-cause death
All-cause death
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Cardiac death
Cardiac death
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Non-fatal MI
Non-fatal MI, defined by Forth Universal definition of MI
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Spontaneous MI
Spontaneous MI, defined by Forth Universal definition of MI
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Procedure-related MI (during follow-up period from invasive procedure)
Procedure-related MI (during follow-up period from invasive procedure), defined by Fourth Universal definition of MI
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome leading to an urgent revascularization
Hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome is defined as a clinical event in which the final diagnosis during unplanned hospitalization is acute coronary syndrome including spontaneous myocardial infarction or unstable angina.
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Bucheon-si, South Korea
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGKyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu, South Korea
RECRUITINGChonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School
Gwangju, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGChung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital
Gwangmyeong, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGInje University College of Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital
Ilsan, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGGachon University Gil Medical Center
Incheon, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGKwandong University Intl. ST. Mary's Hospital
Incheon, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGJeonbuk National University Hospital
Jeonju, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGGyeongsang National University Hospital
Jinju, South Korea
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 12 more locations
Unplanned revascularization (clinically-driven)
All revascularization events will be adjudicated as either clinically-driven or non-clinically-driven. Revascularization will be considered clinically-driven if the diameter stenosis of the revascularized coronary segment is ≥50% by QCA and any of the following criteria for ischemia are met: * A positive functional study corresponding to the area served by the target lesion; or * Ischemic ECG changes at rest in a distribution consistent with the target vessel; or * Typical ischemic symptoms referable to the target lesion; or ④ positive invasive physiologic test (fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 or instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89); or ⑤ presence of stenosis with ≥70% diameter stenosis, even in the absence of other criteria Unplanned revascularization refers to revascularization not planned after initial assessments with invasive coronary angiography or non-invasive stress testing, depending on the allocated group, but performed due to clinical circumstances.
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Definite stent thrombosis
Definite stent thrombosis, defined by Academic Research Consortium (ARC) II consensus
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Rate of invasive coronary angiography during follow-up
Rate of invasive coronary angiography (with or without showing restenosis or obstructive CAD) during follow-up. Angiographic restenosis was defined as a stenosis of at least 50 percent of the minimal luminal diameter in the target-lesion at invasive coronary angiography during follow-up. Obstructive or no obstructive coronary artery disease at invasive coronary angiography is defined as a visually estimated presence or absence of stenosis of 50% or more, as interpreted by the study-site staff, in any major epicardial vessel, including side branches of at least 2.5 mm in diameter.
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Rate of revascularization by PCI or CABG during follow-up
Rate of revascularization by PCI or CABG during follow-up
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Procedure-related complications from invasive procedure during follow-up
Procedure-related complications from invasive procedure during follow-up
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Cerebrovascular accidents
Cerebrovascular accidents (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Contrast-induced nephropathy or contrast-associated hypersensitivity reaction
Contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.5mg/dL or ≥25% from baseline within 48-72 hours after contrast agent exposure or contrast-associated hypersensitivity reaction
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
Total medical cost
Total medical cost
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment
A composite of death or non-fatal MI
A composite of death or non-fatal MI
Time frame: 2 years after the last patient enrollment