This study explores the feasibility of ContextWell, a well-being education programme that combines an online webinar with an AI-powered behavioural nudging system. The programme aims to support university students, particularly those in healthcare disciplines, in enhancing well-being and adopting healthier lifestyle habits. The primary objective is to determine whether the programme can be feasibly delivered within university settings. A secondary objective is to assess its potential to improve student well-being and encourage behavioural changes aligned with lifestyle medicine principles. The intervention builds on the understanding that healthcare professionals' lifestyle habits and well-being have a direct impact on patient care. Focusing on healthcare students helps advance the integration of lifestyle medicine within health education and clinical practice. This single-group feasibility study delivers the full intervention to all participants. Students participate in an online well-being webinar and receive AI-generated behavioural prompts designed to promote self-awareness and healthier daily choices. Key evaluation measures will indicated the feasibility of the programme among young adults in academic environments. Participant feedback and initial outcomes will support future development and inform larger-scale research.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
ContextWell Educational Programme
University College Dublin
Dublin, Ireland
Recruitment Rate
Description: Proportion of eligible participants who enroll in the ContextWell Programme. Metric: % of enrolled participants out of those approached. Measurement Method: Screening and enrolment logs.
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks post-study launch (enrolment period).
Retention Rate
Proportion of enrolled participants completing the programme. Metric: 1. % completing final follow-up. 2. Count completing all study components. Measurement Method: Attendance records, programme tracking data, follow-up survey.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 weeks post-baseline.
Acceptability of the Intervention
Description: Participants' satisfaction with the content, format, and delivery. Metric: Mean satisfaction rating; qualitative feedback. Measurement Method: Post-intervention survey (Likert-scale + open-ended items).
Time frame: At 2 weeks post-intervention.
Demand for the Programme
Participants' expressed interest in continued use and peer recommendation. Metric: % intending to continue use or recommend. Measurement Method: Survey responses on future use/recommendation.
Time frame: At 2 weeks post-intervention.
Implementation Feasibility
Practicality of delivering the intervention as planned. Metric: Number of technical issues. % of content delivered as intended. Measurement Method: Researcher logs, participant feedback.
Time frame: During intervention period, Weeks 1 to 3 post-baseline.
Perceived Impact on Well-Being
Participants' perception of effects on well-being Metric: % reporting improved well-being. Measurement Method: follow-up survey (Likert-scale and reflections).
Time frame: At 4 weeks post-baseline.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.