This prospective, non-randomized study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of treating port-wine stains (capillary malformations) using pulsed dye laser (PDL), potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser, or a sequential combination of both. Each participant will receive all three treatments on different areas of the lesion. The primary outcome is improvement measured using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale. Secondary outcomes include pain (VAS), local adverse events, and patient satisfaction.
Port-wine stains (PWS), also known as capillary malformations, are congenital vascular anomalies affecting approximately 0.3-0.5% of newborns. These lesions, often located on the face and neck, tend to darken and thicken over time, potentially leading to psychosocial distress and reduced quality of life. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) therapy has long been the standard of care, utilizing selective photothermolysis to target dilated capillaries. Despite its safety and effectiveness, complete clearance is achieved in only 10-20% of cases. Recently, long-pulsed potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) lasers operating at 532 nm have emerged as viable options for vascular lesions, offering greater spot sizes, variable pulse durations, and integrated cryogen cooling systems that allow deeper and more consistent energy delivery. Clinical experience suggests that combining PDL and KTP treatments sequentially may enhance treatment outcomes, especially in resistant PWS, yet no controlled study has directly compared this approach to either treatment in isolation. This prospective, single-center, non-randomized clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of PDL (595 nm), KTP (532 nm), and sequential KTP followed by PDL in adults with PWS. Each lesion will be divided into three anatomically comparable areas, each receiving a different treatment modality. All treatments will be administered with cryogen spray cooling and without anesthesia, according to current clinical practice. The primary endpoint is improvement at 6 weeks based on the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale, evaluated by three blinded dermatologists. Secondary outcomes include pain during treatment (VAS), adverse events at 48 hours, and patient satisfaction scores. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled to ensure adequate statistical power and account for potential dropouts. This study seeks to provide evidence supporting the optimal laser treatment strategy for PWS, potentially improving clinical outcomes and guiding future protocols.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
Treatment with a pulsed dye laser (PDL) at 595 nm using the VBeam Prima® system (Candela Medical). Parameters: 10 mm spot size, 7-9 J/cm² fluence, 0.5-3 ms pulse duration. Cryogen spray cooling is applied. No anesthesia is used. This intervention will be applied to one of the three defined regions of each participant's port-wine stain.
Treatment with a KTP laser at 532 nm using the DermaV® system (Lutronic Medical Systems). Parameters: 10 mm spot size, 8-11 J/cm² fluence, 10 ms pulse duration. Cryogen spray cooling is applied. No anesthesia is used. This intervention will be applied to a second anatomically comparable region of the port-wine stain.
Sequential treatment of the same region with two lasers: first with KTP (532 nm, DermaV® system), then with PDL (595 nm, VBeam Prima® system). Each laser will be applied using its standard parameters: KTP (10 mm spot, 8-11 J/cm², 10 ms), followed by PDL (10 mm spot, 7-9 J/cm², 0.5-3 ms). Cryogen spray cooling is used before each pass. No anesthesia is applied. This treatment is administered to a third region of the port-wine stain.
Ramon y Cajal University Hospital
Madrid, Spain, Spain
RECRUITINGChange in lesion appearance measured by Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)
The IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (no changes) to 4 (complete or near-complete clearance). It will be assessed by three blinded dermatologists comparing standardized clinical photographs of each treated area. The outcome will be reported as the mean IGA score per treatment modality.
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
Pain score during laser treatment (VAS)
Participants will rate their pain during each treatment using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum imaginable pain).
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure
Local events at 48 hours
Presence of local side effects such as edema, purpura, and crusting will be documented clinically by the investigators.
Time frame: 48 hours after treatment
Patient satisfaction score
Patients will rate their satisfaction with each treated area on a scale from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 6 (very satisfied).
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.