This prospective cohort study investigates the influence of provider experience and drainage location on fistula formation within 6 months following perianal abscess drainage. Additionally, the study explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI)-based interpretation of magnetic resonance (MR) images in early identification of fistula development.
Perianal abscess drainage is a common surgical procedure. However, subsequent fistula formation remains a significant complication. This study aims to determine whether the procedure setting (operating room, emergency department, or outpatient clinic) and the experience level of the performing clinician affect fistula development rates. Furthermore, the study evaluates the use of AI-assisted analysis of selected MR images to identify early signs of fistula formation. Selected image slices will be labeled based on radiological reports, and a machine learning model will be trained to predict fistula risk. The study will also compare AI-generated interpretations with expert radiologist assessments to validate performance. The ultimate goal is to create a risk stratification tool to support clinical decision-making in surgical management of perianal abscesses.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
450
Fistula formation within 6 months
Confirmed by clinical exam, surgical findings, or MR imaging
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation between drainage location and fistula rate
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation between provider experience and fistula complexity
Time frame: 6 months
Diagnostic accuracy of AI-based MR analysis vs radiologist
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.