The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the BTL-785-7-11 applicator effectiveness for an under-eye appearance improvement by evaluation of the periorbital area in healthy adult volunteers. The main question it aims to answer is: Whether the BTL-785-7-11 applicator is able to improve the periorbital area post-treatment, as assessed by the analysis of 3D photographs. Participants will complete four treatments and two follow-up visits.
The study will evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the BTL-785 device with applicator BTL-785-7-11 for periorbital area rejuvenation. The study has a prospective, multicenter, open-label, and one-arm design. Subjects will be required to complete four (n=4) treatment visits and two (n=2) follow-up visits. At the baseline visit, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be verified upon obtaining informed consent from the patient. Digital 2D and 3D photographs of the treatment area will be taken. The treatment administration phase will consist of four (n=4) treatments, delivered 2 -14 days apart. The applicator will be placed outside the orbital rim, on the subject's inferior orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi muscles and lateral canthal edge-temporal area. Therapy time is set to 20 minutes. At the last therapy visit, the subject's digital 2D and 3D photographs of the treatment area will be collected. In addition, subjects will receive therapy comfort and subject satisfaction questionnaires to fill in. During the 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits, the subjects will undergo 2D and 3D photographing of the treatment area, and the subject satisfaction questionnaires will be collected. Safety measures will include documentation of adverse events (AE), which will be assessed after each procedure and at all follow-up visits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
The treatment administration phase will consist of four (n=4) treatments, delivered 2 -14 days apart. The applicator will be placed outside the orbital rim, on the subject's inferior orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi muscles and lateral canthal edge-temporal area. Therapy time is set to 20 minutes.
Laser & Skin Surgery Medical Group, Inc.
Sacramento, California, United States
Art of Skin MD
Solana Beach, California, United States
Gentile Facial Plastic and Aesthetic Laser center
Youngstown, Ohio, United States
Periorbital area improvement assessment
The evaluation of the periorbital area improvement comparing pre-treatment, the last therapy visit, and both 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits will be based on the analysis of 3D photographs.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-treatment
Assessment of changes in the visual appearance, according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
The assessment of changes in the visual appearance will be based on the evaluation of the 2D photographs, according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS); the ranking is based on the 5-point scale (ranging from -1 to 3), higher score means a more improved appearance.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-treatment
Assessment of changes in the visual appearance, according to the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale
The assessment of changes in the visual appearance will be based on the evaluation of the 2D photographs, according to the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWES); the ranking is based on the 10-point scale (ranging from 0 to 9), higher score means a more severe aesthetic condition being evaluated.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-treatment
Assessment of changes in the visual appearance, according to the Crow's Feet Grading Scale
The assessment of changes in the visual appearance will be based on the evaluation of the 2D photographs, according to the Crow's Feet Grading Scale (CFGS); the ranking is based on the 5-point scale (ranging from 0 to 4), higher score means a more severe crow's feet.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-treatment
Subject satisfaction as assessed by Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Subject Satisfaction evaluation based on the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire; the ranking is based on the 5-point Likert scale (1-5), higher score means higher satisfaction.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-treatment
Comfort as assessed by Therapy Comfort Questionnaire
Therapy comfort evaluation through the Therapy Comfort Questionnaire; the ranking is based on the 5-point Likert scale (1-5), higher score means higher comfort, and on the Numerical Analog scale (0-10), higher score means higher pain.
Time frame: from the first to the last treatment session, assessed up to 56 days
Incidence of Treatment-related Adverse Events
Assessment of safety by evaluating the side effects and AE occurrence throughout the study.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months post-treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.