Myopia, or shortsightedness, is a multifactorial disorder, governed by environmental and genetic factors. Myopia is the most common ocular disorder worldwide with an increasing prevalence over the past few decades and affecting the quality of life and economic health of individuals worsening socio-economic problems. Progressive myopia is nearly exclusively a condition of childhood and adolescence, as in most young adults, myopia has stabilized. Myopia frequently appears in childhood, with a peak incidence occurring between 8 and 10 years of age. The most used topical pharmacological intervention for managing childhood myopia progression is atropine, a non-selective muscarinic antagonist, which has been widely used in clinical trials in concentrations ranging from 0.01% to 1.0%. Atropine is at present the agent with the highest efficacy and optimal safety profile to reduce myopia progression in children and adolescents. MODERATO study, a phase III, prospective, multicentric, randomized, double blind, multiple doses, placebo-controlled parallel-group, adaptive study, aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.025% and 0.05% atropine eye drops in children and adolescents aged 3 to under 18 years old over a 24-month period, to understand its ability to manage and stop myopia getting worse. It will be conducted in 11 centers in Italy, Spain, Poland, the UK and Albania.
The MODERATO study is a phase III, prospective, multicentric, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, adaptive, placebo-controlled trial. The study will be conducted in primary care and hospital settings in 3 European countries (Italy, Spain, Poland), in the UK and in Albania, involving a total of 11 centers. The study hypothesis is that low dose (0.025% and 0.05%) of atropine eye drops will reduce the myopia progression in children and adolescents (3-18 years of age) compared with placebo eye drops, over 24 months. A total of 234 participants from 5 countries will be estimated to take part in the study. Eligible participants with myopia with a spherical equivalent refraction of both eyes at least -0.75 D at baseline will be randomized to treatment (0.025% atropine eye drops, 0.05% atropine eye drops) and placebo groups in 1:1:1 ratio. Each arm will consist of at least 78 individuals. In this study, the primary objective is to evaluate efficacy of 0.025% and 0.05% atropine eye drops in children and adolescents over 24 months to slow the progression of myopia. A formal interim efficacy analysis on the primary endpoint will be planned when the 50% of the total planned sample size has completed the 1-year treatment follow-up (105 evaluable patients in total: 35 in each arm). "EARLY ESCAPE" Phase of Patients after Six Months of Atropine Eye Drops Treatment At the sixth month of treatment, if the patients who received the placebo treatment show worsening of their myopia, they will be switched to the active treatment. This approach is called "early escape", which ensures that the patients receive the best treatment as soon as possible, reducing the time during which they may receive ineffective treatment. The analysis will be conducted by a team of experts, Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC). The treatment after the early escape will be carried out as open label study. Blinding will be maintained for the patients who do not early escape. Analysis after One Year of Treatment When half of the patients in our study complete one year of treatment, a comprehensive analysis will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the main treatment. This means that the results will be considered when data from 105 patients have been collected (35 in each group). The Bayesian inference statistical technique will be used to combine and adapt the data collected during the treatment monitoring period. Adaptive Approach The study has been designed adaptively, which means that it can be adjusted based on the intermediate results emerging during the research. The central advantage of the adaptive design is the ability to include prospectively planned opportunities for modifying study design elements and hypotheses based upon interim data analyses. Bayesian statistics provide a method for updating information about the treatment effect as new data are observed and hence are well suited to interim analyses with accumulating efficacy data. Early stopping for statistical futility is useful in this trial as it can preserve resources that could instead be used on more promising active arms and prevent patients from being given an ineffective experimental treatment dosage. After one year of treatment, for half of the participants there are several scenarios that may occur: 1. If there are 8 or fewer people who respond positively in each group of patients who have received the active treatment (the treatment with medication), there should be the discontinuation of that treatment group as it is deemed ineffective. 2. If there are 27 or more patients who respond positively in both active treatment groups, there should be the discontinuation of the placebo treatment group, as it is confirmed that the active treatment is working well. 3. If there is a significant difference in treatment response between the active groups but the necessary number of patients to discontinue the placebo treatment arm is not reached, it could be hypothesized that the active treatment is advantageous, and the sample size of patients should be reassessed to confirm this hypothesis. After the End of Study visit, no Follow-Up visits are foreseen. The following assessments will be performed throughout the conduction of study: Refraction test for measuring visual acuity (VA) (near and distance); Pupil diameter (PD) in photopic lighting conditions; Accommodation amplitude; Intraocular Pressure Measurement; Stereopsis; Slit lamp examination; Macular/optic disc examination by age appropriate methods (e.g. fundoscopy, or fundus photo); Ocular biometry; Instillation of cycloplegic agents, different participating site will follow their standard cycloplegic regimen (1% Tropicamide and 1% cyclopentolate eye drop); Cycloplegic autorefraction (to evaluate the refractive power of the eye); Measurement of prescription in current glasses (focimetry); Urine pregnancy test; Adverse event (AE)/Serious Adverse Event (SAE) assessments; Questionnaires (Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire - Revised (SREEQ-R), Visual Light Sensitivity Questionnaire-8 (VLSQ-8), 3-items questionnaire for acceptability of the formulation) will be used.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
234
One drop of 0.05% atropine in each eye once a day before bedtime
One drop of 0.025% atropine in each eye once a day before bedtime
One drop of placebo in each eye once a day before bedtime
University Hospital Centre Mother Teresa (UHCT), Paediatric Department
Tirana, Albania
RECRUITINGOphthalmology - AOU Consorziale Policlinico - Ospedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII
Bari, Italy
RECRUITINGPediatric Ophthalmology - Fondazione Irccs Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan
Milan, Italy
RECRUITINGAzienda Ospedale Università Padova
Padua, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGChildren's Memorial Health Institute, Department of Ophthalmology
Warsaw, Poland
RECRUITINGHospital Universitario Parc Taulí
Barcelona, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Puerta del Mar (INIBICA)
Cadiz, Spain
RECRUITINGHospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain
RECRUITINGNorthern Ireland Clinical Research Facility. U Floor. Belfast City Hospital
Belfast, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGSchool of Optometry, Aston University
Birmingham, United Kingdom
RECRUITING...and 1 more locations
Mean annual rate of progression of myopia
The primary outcome measure evaluates the efficacy of atropine in slowing myopia progression in children and adolescents. The mean annual rate of progression of myopia (D/year) based on spherical equivalent (SE) measured by cycloplegic autorefraction over 24 months.
Time frame: 24 months
Number and percentage of early escape patients.
To assess the early escape rate in the placebo group. Patients who show significant myopia progression at the 6-month mark will be switched to atropine eye drops at the investigator's discretion.
Time frame: 6 months
Mean change in axial length and glasses prescription.
Assessment of the mean change in axial length (mm) and glasses prescription over a longer period of time to investigate the efficacy of the intervention.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Safety assessment of atropine.
Evaluation of safety by measuring the counts and percentage of patients reporting any adverse events.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Use of photochromic and/or varifocal lenses.
Number and percentage of participants requiring the use of photochromic and/or varifocal lenses.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Changes in photosensitivity index.
Evaluation of changes in photosensitivity index, used to monitor treatment-induced light sensitivity over time.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity.
Assessment of best corrected distance and near visual acuity using standardised methods appropriate for participant age.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Pupil Diameter (PD) in photopic lighting condition.
Measurement of PD (in mm) under photopic and average lighting using a PD ruler or autorefractor.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Accommodation amplitude.
Measurement of the accommodation amplitude (diopter) performed monocularly and binocularly over distance correction.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
Vision-related quality of life (SREEQ-R).
Patient-reported assessment of vision-related quality of life using validated questionnaire (Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire - Revised - SREEQ-R) at specified time points.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Vision-related quality of life (VLSQ-8).
Patient-reported assessment of vision-related quality of life using validated questionnaire (Self-reported, Visual Light Sensitivity Questionnaire-8 - VLSQ-8) at specified time points.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months
Acceptability of atropine formulation.
Assessment of acceptability of the formulation using a 3-item questionnaire, scored on a six-point scale. The questionnaire consists of a survey investigating ocular symptoms and discomforts after eye drops instillation.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Overall between-group difference from baseline in the proportion of subjects who show < -0.50 D myopia progression (Spherical Equivalent Refraction, SER).
Comparison of the proportion of subjects in each treatment group who show myopia progression (SER) of less than -0.50 D at 24 months. Statistical analysis will include a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test to evaluate between-group differences.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.