This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of metal ceramic fixed dental prostheses veneered with two porcelain systems; Vintage Pro and IPS style ceram and cemented with Beautilink SA cement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
28
full veneered metal ceramic dental prosthesis cemented with resin cement
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
RECRUITINGWear
Measuring device :Digital software (Geomagic) .Measuring Unit :Root mean square
Time frame: 18 months
Restoration Failure
Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria.Measuring Unit:Alpha: none Bravo: Discrete crack .Charlie: Chipping.Delta: Bulk fracture
Time frame: 18 months
Luster of restoration
Measuring device:Modified USPHS criteria Measuring Unit :Alpha: restoration is shiny has enamel like translucent surface.Bravo: restoration is dull and somewhat opaque .Charlie: restoration surface is distinctly dull and opaque.
Time frame: 18 months
Color match
Measuring device:Modified USPHS criteria. Measuring Unit:Alfa: no mismatch in color, shade and translucency between restoration and adjacent teeth Bravo: slight mismatch.Charlie: esthetically unacceptable mismatch
Time frame: 18 months
Surface texture
Measuring device:Modified USPHS criteria.Measuring Unit:Alfa: Smooth, glazed or glossy surface.Bravo: Slightly rough surface.Charlie: Very rough surface
Time frame: 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.