This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of laser acupuncture as an adjunct therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The main research questions are: * Does laser acupuncture, when combined with standard pharmacological treatment, improve lung function (measured by FEV1% and FEV1/FVC ratio) more than sham laser acupuncture after 4 weeks of therapy? * Does this combination also lead to better quality of life, as assessed by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), compared to the control group, after 4 and 8 weeks? * Is there a correlation between lung function (FEV1%) and quality of life scores (CAT and SGRQ)? * Are there any significant adverse effects caused by laser acupuncture compared to sham treatment? Participants will: * Undergo spirometry and complete CAT and SGRQ questionnaires. * Receive either laser acupuncture or sham laser acupuncture sessions. * Return for follow-up assessments at 4 and 8 weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
Laser acupuncture irradiation was performed using an RJ Laser laserpen with a wavelength of 785 nm and an output power of 50 mW. The laser probe was positioned perpendicularly to the skin surface, using a continuous wave mode with a dose of 4 Joules. The acupuncture points targeted were EXB1 and CV17, as well as BL13 and ST36 on both sides of the body. Each point received irradiation for 1 minute and 20 seconds. During the therapy session, subjects wore a headset playing music and protective glasses. The treatment was administered twice a week for a total of 8 sessions.
Sham laser acupuncture irradiation was conducted using an RJ Laser laserpen with a wavelength of 785 nm and an output power of 50 mW at the acupuncture points EXB1 and CV17, as well as BL13 and ST36 on both sides of the body. However, the laser device was not activated, and no radiation was delivered to the patient. The laser probe was positioned perpendicularly to the skin surface at the same acupuncture points, but without activating the laser. During the session, subjects wore a headset with music and protective glasses, similar to the active treatment group. The sham treatment was administered twice a week for a total of 8 sessions.
Universitas Indonesia
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1%)
Pulmonary function will be assessed using spirometry to measure the percentage of the predicted FEV1 value.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after intervention
FEV1/FVC Ratio
Pulmonary function will also be evaluated by calculating the FEV1/FVC ratio through spirometry
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after intervention
COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score
Health status and quality of life will be assessed using the CAT questionnaire, which scores from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score
Quality of life will be assessed using the SGRQ, which includes symptom, activity, and impact domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after intervention
Correlation Between FEV1% and Quality of Life Scores
The correlation between FEV1% and CAT/SGRQ scores will be analyzed. Quality of life was assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The CAT score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating a worse impact of COPD on the patient's health status. The SGRQ score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks
Adverse Events Related to Intervention
Any adverse events after the intervention, such as infection, pain, or skin irritation at the laser site, will be monitored and recorded.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention until 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.