This study evaluates whether adding a spacer device to triple inhaled therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA via pMDI) can reduce acute exacerbations in elderly patients (≥65 years) with stable chronic airway diseases (COPD or asthma) who are classified as high-risk based on GOLD or GINA guidelines. High risk is defined as ≥1 hospitalization or ≥2 moderate exacerbations in the past 12 months. Despite receiving triple inhaled therapy, these patients often have poor inhaler technique due to age-related limitations. A spacer may improve drug delivery, adherence, and reduce local side effects. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 380 participants will be assigned to standard therapy with or without a valved spacer. The primary outcome is the 3-month incidence of moderate-to-severe exacerbations. Secondary outcomes include lung function, adherence, inhalation technique, side effects, and patient satisfaction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
380
Participants in this group will use a valved mouthpiece spacer in combination with standard triple inhaled therapy delivered by a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (ICS/LABA/LAMA). The spacer device helps reduce the need for hand-breath coordination, prolongs aerosol suspension time, and improves drug delivery to the lungs. Participants will be trained in proper spacer use, including device attachment, timing of actuation and inhalation, mouth seal technique, cleaning, and daily maintenance. This intervention aims to optimize inhalation technique, improve treatment adherence, and potentially reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe exacerbations.
Participants in the control group will receive a standard fixed-dose combination of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting beta-agonist (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) administered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). No spacer will be used. All participants will receive standardized inhalation technique training at baseline, including hand-held device usage, actuation-inhalation timing, breath-hold, and mouth rinsing. This group represents the current standard-of-care for stable, high-risk COPD or asthma patients as per GOLD and GINA guidelines.
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, China
RECRUITINGThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, China
RECRUITINGAnhui Chest Hospital
Hefei, China
RECRUITINGBeilun District Second People's Hospital
Ningbo, China
RECRUITINGNingbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital
Ningbo, China
RECRUITINGThe First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University
Ningbo, China
RECRUITINGNinghai County First Hospital
Ninghai, China
RECRUITINGTaizhou Central Hospital
Taizhou, China
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGTaizhou Municipal Hospital
Taizhou, China
RECRUITINGIncidence of Moderate-to-Severe Acute Exacerbations Within 3 Months
Moderate exacerbation is defined as a worsening of respiratory symptoms requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbation is defined as requiring emergency department visit or hospitalization. All events must be confirmed by the treating physician and recorded in the case report form (CRF). This outcome evaluates whether the use of a valved spacer reduces the rate of such events compared to standard therapy alone.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Change in Post-Bronchodilator FEV₁ From Baseline to 3 Months
FEV₁ (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) will be measured using a standardized spirometer following ATS/ERS guidelines. Change will be assessed as both absolute value and percentage improvement. A clinically meaningful improvement is defined as an increase of ≥100 mL or ≥12% from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Treatment Adherence Score (MARS Questionnaire) From Baseline to 3 and 6 Months
The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS questionnaire, 10-item version) will be used to assess adherence. The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating better adherence. Improvement is defined as an increase of ≥3 points from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Time to First Moderate-to-Severe Acute Exacerbation
Time from randomization to first moderate or severe exacerbation will be recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be used to compare groups. Events will be defined per GOLD/GINA criteria and confirmed by treating physicians.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Change in Inhalation Technique Score From Baseline to 3 Months
Inhalation technique will be scored using a structured checklist (5 items × 5 points, total score 25). Components include device handling, breath-hold, actuation timing and cleaning. Improvement is defined as an increase of ≥5 points.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months
Change in Local Side Effect Score (ICS-Related)
Monthly assessments of local side effects related to ICS will be recorded, including throat irritation, hoarseness, and oral discomfort. Each symptom will be rated on a 0-10 scale (0 = none, 10 = severe).
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 3 months
Change in Patient Satisfaction Score (VAS)
A visual analog scale (VAS, range 0-10) will be used to assess satisfaction with the inhalation treatment method. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months
Asthma Control Level Based on Four GINA-Recommended Indicators
For asthma patients, control status will be evaluated based on four criteria: daytime symptoms \>2/week, nighttime awakening, reliever use \>2/week, and activity limitation. Control will be categorized as: well-controlled (0), partly controlled (1-2), or uncontrolled (≥3).
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.