This single-center, non-profit, observational-interventional study aims to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models for the automatic assessment of chronic pain (APA - Automatic Pain Assessment). The study will enroll adult patients with chronic pain of various origins (oncologic and non-oncologic). Participants will undergo multidimensional evaluations that include clinical assessments, self-report questionnaires, bio-signal collection (e.g., EEG, EDA, HRV, GSR, PPG), and facial expression analysis via infrared thermography and video recordings. The primary objective is to calibrate and test machine learning and deep learning models to recognize and predict the presence and severity of pain using multimodal data inputs. Secondary objectives include evaluating the effectiveness of pain treatments, assessing quality of life, and developing a standardized APA dataset for future research. All data collection procedures are non-invasive and safe, and include tools like wearable sensors and standardized neurocognitive tests. The study is approved by the Italian Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Territoriale Campania 2) and complies with GDPR and EU AI regulations.
This study, titled "Refining mUltiple artificial intelliGence strateGies for automatic pain assessment Investigations" (RUGGI), explores the integration of AI in chronic pain evaluation. Pain is a multidimensional and subjective experience, and conventional assessment methods often rely solely on self-reported scales. This introduces the risk of over- or under-treatment. To overcome this limitation, the study leverages multimodal data-including physiological signals, facial expressions, and linguistic analysis-to build models capable of objectively assessing pain intensity and characteristics. The primary aim is to calibrate predictive models (e.g., Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Convolutional Neural Networks, YOLO architectures, and MLPs) that can recognize pain patterns using supervised and unsupervised learning. Bio-signals (EEG, HRV, GSR, EMG), infrared thermography (HIRA system), and prosodic-linguistic features will be analyzed. Data will be collected during structured timepoints: baseline (rest), Stroop test execution, and follow-up. Patients are recruited based on chronic pain diagnosis per IASP and ICD-11 criteria. Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 and informed consent. The study foresees a target enrollment of approximately 200 patients within 6 months. Data will be processed following a rigorous AI pipeline, including preprocessing, feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and cross-validation (k-fold with grid search optimization). Outcome measures include the Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and model explainability (via SHAP, LIME). Secondary outcomes include assessing patient-reported quality of life, evaluating analgesic strategies, and generating a public-use APA dataset. All procedures are compliant with Good Clinical Practice (GCP), GDPR, and EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Reg. 2024/1689). The study is conducted at the University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona" in Salerno, Italy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
200
A non-invasive, multimodal diagnostic procedure combining self-reported pain scales (NRS, DN-4, BPI), wearable biosignal acquisition (EDA, EMG, HRV, EEG), facial thermography (HIRA system), video-based facial expression analysis, linguistic interview, and the Stroop Test. Data are used to train and validate machine learning models for automatic pain assessment in chronic pain patients.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona
Salerno, Italy, Italy
RECRUITINGAccuracy of AI models in classifying chronic pain
Accuracy will be calculated to evaluate how well supervised machine learning and deep learning models can correctly classify the presence of chronic pain using multimodal data (e.g., biosignals, facial thermography, video, and audio).
Time frame: From Day 0 (baseline) to Day 30 (follow-up)
Sensitivity of AI models in classifying chronic pain
Sensitivity (true positive rate) will be computed to determine the model's ability to correctly identify patients experiencing chronic pain. Unit of measure: Sensitivity (%)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
Specificity of AI models in classifying chronic pain
Specificity (true negative rate) will be computed to assess the model's ability to correctly identify patients who are not experiencing chronic pain. Unit of measure: Specificity (%)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
Precision of AI models in classifying chronic pain
Precision (positive predictive value) will be calculated to assess the proportion of correct positive predictions among all positive classifications. Unit of measure: Precision (%)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
F1-score of AI models in classifying chronic pain
F1-score, the harmonic mean of precision and sensitivity, will be used to assess overall model performance, especially in the presence of class imbalance. Unit of measure: F1-score (numeric value)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
AUC-ROC of AI models in classifying chronic pain
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) will be used to evaluate the model's ability to discriminate between pain and no-pain conditions across thresholds. Unit of measure: AUC-ROC (numeric value from 0 to 1)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score
This outcome will measure patients' perceived improvement in their condition using the PGIC scale. Unit of measure: Score on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = No change to 7 = Very much improved)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) interference score
This outcome will measure how much pain interferes with daily functioning, using the BPI interference subscale. Unit of measure: Score from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference)
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
Correlation between analgesic treatments and pain intensity (NRS)
The outcome will assess the correlation between the type and frequency of analgesic treatments and changes in pain intensity, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Unit of measure: Pearson correlation coefficient (r), NRS scores from 0 to 10
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 30
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.