Large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions are increasingly detected thanks to screening programs worldwide. ESD is the technique which provides a high-quality resection of these large polyps. Nevertheless, colorectal ESD is burdened by technical difficulties and several adverse events affecting its outcomes. The adverse events could be life-threatening, call for or prolong the hospitalization, require blood transfusion, additional endoscopic or surgical procedures and increase costs. Failure of endoscopic resection requiring surgery for benign lesions could affect patients' quality of life and increase healthcare systems' costs. Thus, improving colorectal ESD outcomes is an important clinical and medico-economic objective. The underwater setting with saline has been already established as a better option than conventional CO2 insufflation for EMR of large colonic polyps. Moreover, use of the underwater approach for colorectal ESD has been increasingly reported with good results in the last few years. However, a randomized comparative trial between conventional and underwater colorectal ESD clarifying which should be the preferred approach is lacking. Expected benefits are a decrease of adverse events and an increase of successful R0 resection rate of colorectal ESD.
The procedure in this study involves the application of underwater ESD for the resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Underwater ESD is a technique wherein the polyp is removed in an en bloc fashion. The procedure initiates with the identification and delineation of the polyp borders through careful endoscopic examination. Subsequently, after filling the lumen with saline and sucking all the air, initial submucosal injection of saline and methylene blue is performed to lift the lesion. After that, subsequent mucosal incision with ESD knife all around the lesion and submucosal dissection deep in the submucosal layer leading to an en bloc resection will be performed. The clinical practice and technique of underwater ESD and conventional ESD performed during the course of the trial, will not be modified from standard clinical practice.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
122
Underwater ESD (U-ESD): after filling the lumen with saline and sucking all the air, initial submucosal injection of saline and methylene blue is performed; subsequent mucosal incision with ESD knife all around the lesion and submucosal dissection deep in the submucosal layer leading to an en bloc resection is carried out
Conventional ESD (C-ESD): under CO2 insufflation, initial submucosal injection of saline and methylene blue is performed; subsequent mucosal incision with ESD knife all around the lesion and submucosal dissection deep in the submucosal layer leading to an en bloc resection is carried out.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, MI, Italy
R0 resection
Rate of successful and safe endoscopic resection defined as an R0 resection with no major adverse events (defined as any major procedure-related complication, such as delayed bleeding, intraprocedural and delayed perforation or post-electrocoagulation syndrome)
Time frame: 24 hours
Compare
Compare the: * mean procedural time; * rate of en bloc resection; * rate of R0 resection; * rate of curative resection; * length of hospitalization; * rate of intraprocedural perforation; * rate of intraprocedural bleeding.
Time frame: at 24 hours
delayed perforation
To compare the proportion of delayed perforation between the two groups
Time frame: at 1 months
proportion of post-electrocoagulation syndrome
To compare the proportion of post-electrocoagulation syndrome between the two groups
Time frame: at Day 7
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.