This multicentre study, employing a randomised controlled repeated measures experimental design, will be conducted in several Portuguese institutions that provide care and support services for older adults diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). The primary aim is to evaluate the effects of two distinct cognitive stimulation modalities (digital vs physical/analogue). The study will assess the impact of individual cognitive stimulation on multiple domains - specifically cognitive function (with an emphasis on memory and executive function), mood, and quality of life - and investigate how institutional and territorial characteristics influence these effects, considering geographical and organisational diversity as potential moderating factors.
Population ageing has increased the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases, with Alzheimer's disease (AD) being the most common form of dementia. Its wide-ranging impact on cognition, emotion, and daily function necessitates person-centred, multidimensional interventions. In Portugal, dementia affects around 9.5% of those aged 65+, underlining its public health relevance and the need for effective responses. In the absence of a cure, non-pharmacological interventions like cognitive stimulation (CS) have gained prominence. CS is an evidence-based, psychosocial approach involving structured activities that enhance cognitive functions such as memory, language, attention, and reasoning. Broader and more relational than cognitive training or rehabilitation, CS is effective-especially in mild to moderate AD-in improving cognition, mood, and quality of life. Portuguese and international guidelines support its use, with studies showing potential in reducing depression and anxiety in older adults. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)-including agitation, apathy, aggression, anxiety, and sleep issues-are common in AD and often more disruptive than cognitive decline. These symptoms increase caregiver stress and the likelihood of institutionalisation. CS may alleviate BPSD through emotional engagement and behavioural regulation. Assessing CS efficacy requires reliable tools. The Mini-Mental State Examination is widely used in Portugal for cognitive screening, while the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale is often used in clinical trials. As AD notably impairs executive functions, CS targeting these domains can support autonomy and adaptive behaviour. Contextual factors, such as institutional resources and geographic location, may influence CS outcomes. However, few studies consider these variables, despite their relevance for implementing sustainable, real-world interventions. This research adopts a multicentre, randomised controlled design to examine two individual CS modalities in older adults with mild to moderate AD attending Portuguese social care services. It aims to assess CS effects on global cognition (particularly executive function and memory), mood, and quality of life, and to explore how institutional and territorial factors shape outcomes. By combining validated measures, structured protocols, and a context-sensitive approach, the study seeks to support the implementation of effective, sustainable CS interventions within Portugal's care system.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
514
Individual cognitive stimulation sessions will be delivered using RehaCom software, which provides adaptive, computerised exercises targeting specific cognitive domains.
Individual cognitive stimulation sessions will employ structured physical materials, specifically the 'Memories from North to South©' and 'Cognitive Domains' resources, applied on an alternating basis.
AMITEI
Leiria, Leria, Portugal
Associação de Desenvolvimento Comunitário do Funchal - Garouta do Calhau
Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
Instituto S. João de Deus Funchal
Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
Associação Alzheimer Açores
Açores, Portugal
Santa Casa da Misericórdia da Horta
Açores, Portugal
Cognitive functioning assessed through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Cognitive functioning assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a gold standard screening tool for assessing global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in cognitive functioning assessed through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a gold standard screening tool for assessing global cognitive function.Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in cognitive functioning assessed through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), a gold standard screening tool for assessing global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline
Cognitive functioning assessed through Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-COG)
Evaluates the severity of cognitive deficits in AD in the following domains: memory, orientation, language, praxis and constructive capacity. The total score in the Portuguese version of ADAS-Cog is composed of 11 subtests in the cognitive part and varies between 0 (better performance) and 68 points (worse performance), i.e., higher scores equals better performance.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in cognitive functioning assessed through Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-COG)
Evaluates the severity of cognitive deficits in AD in the following domains: memory, orientation, language, praxis and constructive capacity. The total score in the Portuguese version of ADAS-Cog is composed of 11 subtests in the cognitive part and varies between 0 (better performance) and 68 points (worse performance), i.e., higher scores equals better performance.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in cognitive functioning assessed through Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-COG)
Evaluates the severity of cognitive deficits in AD in the following domains: memory, orientation, language, praxis and constructive capacity. The total score in the Portuguese version of ADAS-Cog is composed of 11 subtests in the cognitive part and varies between 0 (better performance) and 68 points (worse performance), i.e., higher scores equals better performance.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline
Memory function evaluated through Memory Alteration Test (MAT)
The MAT is used to assess memory function. It is an easy and quick instrument that assesses five memory domains: temporal orientation, encoding, semantic memory, free recall, and cued recall. Total scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating better memory. It has good psychometric properties and is highly sensitive to mild cognitive decline.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in memory function evaluated through Memory Alteration Test (MAT)
The MAT is used to assess memory function. It is an easy and quick instrument that assesses five memory domains: temporal orientation, encoding, semantic memory, free recall, and cued recall. Total scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating better memory. It has good psychometric properties and is highly sensitive to mild cognitive decline.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in memory function evaluated through Memory Alteration Test (MAT)
The MAT is used to assess memory function. It is an easy and quick instrument that assesses five memory domains: temporal orientation, encoding, semantic memory, free recall, and cued recall. Total scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating better memory. It has good psychometric properties and is highly sensitive to mild cognitive decline.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline
Executive functions assessed through Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
FAB assesses executive functions such as abstract thinking, mental flexibility, motor programming, interference sensibility, inhibitory control and environmental independence. Scores range between 0 - 18 points with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in executive functions assessed through Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
FAB assesses executive functions such as abstract thinking, mental flexibility, motor programming, interference sensibility, inhibitory control and environmental independence. Scores range between 0 - 18 points with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in executive functions assessed through Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
FAB assesses executive functions such as abstract thinking, mental flexibility, motor programming, interference sensibility, inhibitory control and environmental independence. Scores range between 0 - 18 points with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline
Mood assessed through the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15)
The GDS-15 is used to measure mood. It is considered a reliable tool to screen depressive symptoms in older people. With a dichotomous format (yes/no answers), this scale assesses depression in older people. Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in mood assessed through the GDS-15
The GDS-15 is used to measure mood. It is considered a reliable tool to screen depressive symptoms in older people. With a dichotomous format (yes/no answers), this scale assesses depression in older people. Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in mood assessed through the GDS-15
The GDS-15 is used to measure mood. It is considered a reliable tool to screen depressive symptoms in older people. With a dichotomous format (yes/no answers), this scale assesses depression in older people. Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline
Anxiety symptomatology assessed through the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
It assesses, in several contexts, the severity of anxiety symptoms in the older adults. It consists in 20 dichotomous response items (I agree/disagree) and refers to the subject's feelings in the week prior to the evaluation. One (1) point is assigned to each agree answer and the overall score is obtained by adding the scores of all items. Scores over 10/11 points indicate symptoms of severe anxiety.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in anxiety symptomatology assessed through the GAI
It assesses, in several contexts, the severity of anxiety symptoms in the older adults. It consists in 20 dichotomous response items (I agree/disagree) and refers to the subject's feelings in the week prior to the evaluation. One (1) point is assigned to each agree answer and the overall score is obtained by adding the scores of all items. Scores over 10/11 points indicate symptoms of severe anxiety.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Vila do Porto
Açores, Portugal
CASTIIS
Aveiro, Portugal
CEDIARA - Associação de Solidariedade Social de Ribeira de Fráguas
Aveiro, Portugal
Centro Apoio Social Mozelos
Aveiro, Portugal
Centro Social da Freguesia de Casal Comba
Aveiro, Portugal
...and 29 more locations
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in anxiety symptomatology assessed through the GAI
It assesses, in several contexts, the severity of anxiety symptoms in the older adults. It consists in 20 dichotomous response items (I agree/disagree) and refers to the subject's feelings in the week prior to the evaluation. One (1) point is assigned to each agree answer and the overall score is obtained by adding the scores of all items. Scores over 10/11 points indicate symptoms of severe anxiety.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline
Quality of life evaluated through Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
The QoL-AD is used to assess quality of life. This 13-item scale assesses the quality of life in people diagnosed with dementia, gathering information from the patient about the following domains: perceived health, mood, physical condition, interpersonal relationships, hobbies, decision-making skills, and life as a whole. Scores range from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Time frame: Baseline
Change in quality of life evaluated through QoL-AD
The QoL-AD is used to assess quality of life. This 13-item scale assesses the quality of life in people diagnosed with dementia, gathering information from the patient about the following domains: perceived health, mood, physical condition, interpersonal relationships, hobbies, decision-making skills, and life as a whole. Scores range from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the baseline
Change in quality of life evaluated through QoL-AD
The QoL-AD is used to assess quality of life. This 13-item scale assesses the quality of life in people diagnosed with dementia, gathering information from the patient about the following domains: perceived health, mood, physical condition, interpersonal relationships, hobbies, decision-making skills, and life as a whole. Scores range from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Time frame: 24 weeks after the baseline