Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Improve Language in Down Syndrome.

Overview

Down syndrome (DS) is associated with cognitive deficits, caused by alterations in neuroplasticity and synaptic transmission. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can modulate the brain's plasticity mechanisms and neurotransmitter balance. Anodal tDCS increases cortical excitability by depolarizing neurons, while cathodal tDCS decreases it through hyperpolarization. When combined with cognitive training, tDCS may produce faster and longer-lasting therapeutic effects. Although most of the neurorehabilitation studies have applied anodal excitatory stimulation, recent evidence suggests the potential cathodal inhibitory stimulation in neurodevelopmental disorders with alteration of synaptic transmission, as people with DS. Potentially both anodal and cathodal stimulation protocols could lead to positive clinical effects in DS. This proof-of-concept study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial aiming to evaluate the efficacy of two active tDCS protocols (anodal and cathodal) targeting the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) versus sham stimulation tDCS, combined with speech and language training, to improve language skills in adolescents and young adults with DS. The study also aims to identify the most effective parameters of tDCS treatment, for customization in adolescents and young adults with DS. Thirty-six participants, aged 12 to 21 years, will be randomly assigned to three groups receiving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS. Each participant will undergo 10 sessions of tDCS at 1 mA for 20 minutes, alongside speech and language training five times for two weeks. Neuropsychological, behavioral, biomarker (including brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurofilament light chain), and electroencephalogram assessments will be performed at baseline, post-treatment, and three months after treatment completion. The study hypothesizes that tDCS will enhance language abilities, particularly expressive vocabulary, and modulate biomarkers of brain plasticity in DS participants. The study also hypothesizes that tDCS will enhance other cognitive and behavioral functions. Since tDCS effects may last, the study will check for improvements at the three-month. If effective, this combined approach of tDCS and language training could pave the way for new rehabilitation strategies for DS.

Down Syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy 21, is the leading genetic cause of Intellectual Disability. This chronic and complex condition disrupts normal brain development and function, resulting in deficits in cognition and adaptive behavior. A hallmark of DS is cognitive impairment, characterized by low IQ and difficulties in learning, language processing, and executive functioning-largely associated with atypical neural organization. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in uncovering the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for these deficits. Research has identified specific neuroanatomical and neurochemical abnormalities, including alterations in the glutamatergic and GABAergic systems, as well as dysregulation of neuromodulators such as noradrenaline, dopamine, and acetylcholine. Individuals with DS also exhibit compromised synaptic plasticity, reduced neurogenesis, and diminished neural remodeling capacity-all contributing to their unique cognitive profile. These neurobiological insights have spurred interest in developing therapeutic interventions aimed at improving cognitive function. Although some pharmacological strategies have shown promise in preclinical and limited clinical trials, their clinical translation has often yielded limited success, underscoring the need for alternative approaches. Among these, non-invasive brain stimulation (NiBS), particularly Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), is emerging as a promising method to enhance cognitive and language abilities. The primary goal of this project is to build a robust scientific basis for novel brain-targeted rehabilitation strategies, specifically to address language deficits in adolescents and young adults with DS. Given the limited research on NiBS in this population, this proof-of-concept study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of two active tDCS protocols-anodal and cathodal stimulation-targeting the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), both compared to a placebo (sham) stimulation condition. This is a proof-of-concept, non-profit, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Both participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Thirty-six participants with DS, aged 12 to 21 years, will be randomly assigned to three groups receiving anodal, cathodal, or sham (placebo) tDCS combined with speech and language training. The intervention comprises ten sessions of either anodal tDCS, cathodal tDCS, or sham (placebo) stimulation, delivered over two consecutive weeks (five sessions per week), in conjunction with a tailored speech and language training protocol. The stimulation intensity will be set at 1 mA for 20 minutes per session, each speech and language treatment session, administered by a trained speech therapist, will last 20 minutes structured in 10 minutes of motor planning/programming and 10 minutes addressing lexical, morphosyntactic, and functional language domains. A neuropsychological, linguistic, behavioural and functional communication assessment will be will be carried prior to (baseline - T0), following the end of the treatments after two weeks (T1) and at 3 months after the end of treatment (T2), to evaluate potential long-lasting benefits. In addition to behavioral and cognitive measures, the study will explore biological markers of treatment response, specifically plasma levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL), as well as EEG recordings, to evaluate neuronal plasticity changes after treatment. The primary outcome measure will be expressive vocabulary assessed by the Naming subtests of the Battery for the Assessment of Language in Children aged 4 to 12 years (BVL\_4-12). Secondary outcome measures will include: Language and verbal skills: * Articulation, Naming, Semantic Fluency, and Phonological Fluency subtests of the Battery for the Assessment of Language in Children aged 4 to 12 years (BVL\_4-12) * Inconsistency Task - 28 Italian words, based on the Inconsistency subtest of the DEAP (Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology). * Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS): Italian version, a parent-report scale widely validated worldwide, allowing caregivers to rate their child's functional speech intelligibility with different communicative partners. Adaptive behavior and cognitive function: -Adaptive Behavior Assessment System - Second Edition (ABAS-II), a questionnaire summarizing information on adaptive behavior and skills. Verbal Span Task (VST), assessing verbal short-term memory by having the examiner read aloud five sequences of high-frequency disyllabic words at one word per second. Behavioral assessment: * Conners' Parent Rating Scales Long Version, Revised, (CPRS-R:L) widely used for screening ADHD and related symptoms. * Child Behavior Checklist 6-18 (CBCL/6-18), a 113-item parent-report instrument designed to assess behavior and emotional problems in children. * Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), used to evaluate challenging behaviors. Sleep disturbances: -Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), a parent-report questionnaire to collect information on sleep disturbances in children and adolescents. Quality of life and parental stress: * Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) , a brief measure of health-related quality of life. * Parenting Stress Index 4 (PSI-4), exploring parental stress levels in the parent-child relationship. Adherence to safety protocols will be ensured throughout the study, with side effects systematically monitored using a standardized questionnaire after each session and during the follow-up period. Ultimately, this study seeks to generate high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of tDCS-compared to placebo-in enhancing language and cognitive outcomes in DS, while contributing to the identification of biomarkers predictive of individual responsiveness to neuromodulation-based interventions.