Very large tears of the shoulder tendons (the 'rotator cuff') that are not surgically repairable and in the absence of significant shoulder arthritis are common in older patients, and are associated with significant pain and functional limitations. Transfer of one particular tendon called the trapezius is becoming popular as a means of restoring function and improving pain in patients with massive rotator cuff tears. This tendon is appealing for transfer, as it has a similar line of pull to the infraspinatus (one of the rotator cuff tendons). There is currently no clear surgical consensus regarding the optimal treatment of patients with symptomatic massive irreparable rotator cuff tears that are appropriate candidates for joint salvage treatment, and no high level of evidence studies to guide clinical decision making have been published. A pilot study is required prior to the development of a full-scale trial to assess its feasibility and recruitment across clinical sites, to determine protocol adherence (errors in randomization), and patient retention over a 12-month period. The main objective of this pilot trial is to assess a composite measure of feasibility including recruitment, protocol adherence, and patient retention at one-year. The secondary objectives, currently exploratory only, are to determine the clinical outcomes of lower trapezius tendon transfer versus arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair and biceps tenodesis/tenotomy on clinical outcome measures, shoulder function, adverse events and reoperation rates at two-years. This pilot study is a parallel-group multicentre randomized controlled trial with participating sites across Canada, and one site in the United States.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
This procedure is performed arthroscopically. The lower trapezius tendon is harvested from the back of the shoulder blade. A donor tendon is then used to extend the lower trapezius tendon so that it can reach the top of the arm bone. The tendon graft is then attached to the top of the arm bone, while the other end remains attached to the lower trapezius tendon itself. Any additional concomitant procedures (e.g. debridement, biceps release…etc.) may be performed as well.
This procedure is performed arthroscopically. The massive rotator cuff tear will be repaired by securing the loose tendon ends to the bone with suture anchors. The surgeon may also conduct a debridement of the area to remove any broken-down cartilage and tissues. Finally, the biceps tendon in will be further inspected for any damage or inflammatory changes, and the tendon may be released at the discretion of the surgeon (known as a biceps tenodesis or tenotomy depending on technique).
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Feasibility of Recruitment and Follow-Up
Assess the feasibility of this pilot trial as determined by: (1) Recruitment rate of 6 per month across study centres; (2) 3 or fewer crossovers for enrolled participants; and (3) 85% of participants have a full adherence to protocol.
Time frame: 1-year
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Score (WORC)
The WORC is a disease specific evaluation, proven to be an accurate and valid assessment of quality of life for rotator cuff disease. The WORC is a patient-reported measure, 21-question survey. Each question is measured using a visual analog scale rated from 0-100, where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
Constant Score
The Constant Score reflects an overall clinical functional assessment. This instrument is based on a 100-point scoring system. Subjective findings (pain, activities of daily living, and working in different positions) make up a total of 35 points. Objective measurements make up the remaining 65 points. The test is divided into four sub-categories: (1) pain is measured using 4 likert levels (15 points maximum), where a higher score indicates a better outcome; activities of daily living are measured using a likert scale, where a higher number indicates better outcomes (20 points maximum); mobility is measured by an assessor, and rated using a likert scale where a higher score indicates better outcomes (40 points maximum); finally, strength is measured by an assessor where 1 point is given per 0.5kg of force (maximum 25 points), a higher score indicates better outcomes. All categories are added together, and a total score out of 100 is given (higher score indicates better outcome).
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment form (ASES)
The ASES is a shoulder specific assessment divided into two sections: pain and activities of daily living (ADL). Pain is recorded on a visual analogue scale (0-10), lower scores indicate better outcomes. There are 10 activities of daily living questions, each are recorded on a 4 level likert scale (0-3), which a higher score indicates a better outcome. The overall score is an equal weight of the two sections and produces a score out of 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
Subjective Shoulder Value
A participant's subjective value on shoulder function will be assessed using a questionnaire. The overall functional value of the shoulder is written as a percentage from 0-100% of a normal shoulder. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
EuroQol EQ-5D-5L
The EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire is a brief, easy to administer generic health status questionnaire, consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take one of five responses (each question rated 1-5), lower scores indicate better outcome. It also includes a visual analogue scale for recording an individual's rating of their current health-related quality of life (scale 0 to 100), where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
Functional Range of Motion
Measured in degrees, and active movement. Range of motion measures include forward elevation (flexion), abduction, and external rotation from a neutral position, and internal rotation at the spinal level.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
Strength
Measured using a dynamometer, and from the external rotation in neutral position. Strength will be reported in pounds.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
Ultrasound
Ultrasound will be used to evaluate tendon healing rate after the repair or the transfer and assess for integrity. If the repair/transfer has healed it is considered a better outcome (tendon healing - yes/no).
Time frame: 1-year post-operative
Reoperation Rate
The number of reoperations will be monitored and recorded and compared between study groups. A higher rate of reoperations indicates a worse outcome.
Time frame: 2-years post-operative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.