Efficacy of Different Osseodensification Techniques

Delta University for Science and Technology18 enrolled

Overview

different possible osseodensification techniques used to improve bone density around dental implants, using either \] osseodensifying drills, reverse drilling of conventional drills, and rotary expanders.

the study include 3 groups with different implant drilling protocols; group 1 where osseodensifying burs are used, group 2 where conventional drills with reverse motion are used, group 3 where rotary expanders are used

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

OTHER

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Osseodensification

Interventions

osseodenification with osseodensifying bursPROCEDURE

different osseodensification techniques to be studied

reverse drillingPROCEDURE

using the conventional drills in reverse mode

rotary expandersPROCEDURE

expanders in clockwise direction

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 45 YearsMax age: 60 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * · Adult osteoporotic female patients confirmed by CBCT grey values ranging from 290 to 420 HU, with age range 45-60 years. * Patients should be free from any other systemic diseases, according to ASA classifications (American society of Anesthesiologists). * Patients of single or multiple missing teeth in the posterior mandible. * A ridge width of 4mm and a height of \> 8mm above the roof of Inferior Alveolar canal. * No buccal concavities were present at the planned implant site Exclusion Criteria: * · Poor oral hygiene. * Heavy smoker (more than 20 cigarettes /day),or alcoholic abusing patients. * Radiation therapy to the head and neck region, or chemotherapy in the last 6 months prior to the implant placement.

Locations (1)

Delta university for science and technology

Al Mansurah, Daqhlia, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

peri implant bone density

through ROI (region of interest) to measure Grey scale on Cone beam computed tomography CBCT

Time frame: 12 months

implant stability quotient

ISQ (implant stability quotient) using osstell device

Time frame: 12 months

alveolar ridge dimension changes

with cone beam computed tomography CBCT in coronal and sagittal cuts, in millimeters mm .

Time frame: 12 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.