This phase III trial compares the addition of induction chemotherapy, with carboplatin, paclitaxel and pembrolizumab, to chemotherapy and radiation, with cisplatin and pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab maintenance for the treatment of patients with cervical cancer that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced). Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of cancer cells. Paclitaxel is in a class of medications called antimicrotubule agents. It stops cancer cells from growing and dividing and may kill them. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of cancer cells. Adding induction chemotherapy to the usual treatment of chemotherapy and radiation followed by maintenance may be more effective in treating patients with high risk, locally advanced cervical cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine whether induction immunotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) + IO improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared to CCRT+IO alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess whether induction IO and chemotherapy prior to CCRT+IO improves the overall survival (OS) compared to CCRT+IO alone. II. To determine the nature and degree of toxicity of induction IO and chemotherapy prior to CCRT + IO as compared to concurrent CCRT+IO as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. III. To determine the impact on CCRT start, CCRT completion time, and number of cycles of cisplatin administered; with induction IO and chemotherapy prior to CCRT+IO arm as compared to CCRT+IO. IV. To assess the association between allostatic load and PFS/OS. V. To assess the predictive value of the integrated biomarker: PD-L1 expression at baseline for progression free survival. VI. To assess the prognostic and predictive value of the integrated biomarker: circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) at baseline and at 3 months post radiation therapy (RT) for progression free survival. VII. To explore radiotherapy quality pretreatment scores conducted by expert review with assistance from artificial intelligence (AI) models and correlation with outcomes. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the evolution of T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire on treatment and its correlation with clinical outcomes. II. To identify pre-treatment tumor microenvironment biomarkers predictive of outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 1: CHEMORADIATION: Patients receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) once weekly (QW) for 5 weeks and pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 5 doses. Patients also undergo radiation therapy once daily 5 days per week for 25-29 treatments in weeks 1-5 followed by brachytherapy up to twice per week for 4-5 treatments in weeks 5-7. Treatment is given in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity MAINTENANCE: Patients receive pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes every 6 weeks (Q6W) for 15 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo positron emission tomography (PET) scan, computed tomography (CT) scan, chest x-ray and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and blood sample collection throughout the study. ARM 2: INDUCTION: Patients receive carboplatin IV and paclitaxel IV QW on weeks 1-3 and pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes Q3W on weeks 1 for each cycle. Cycles repeat every 3 weeks for 2 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. CHEMORADIATION: Patients receive cisplatin IV QW for 5 weeks and pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes every Q3W for 5 doses. Patients also undergo radiation therapy once daily 5 days per week for 25-29 treatments in weeks 7-11 followed by brachytherapy up to twice per week for 4-5 treatments in weeks 11-13. Treatment is given in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity MAINTENANCE: Patients receive pembrolizumab IV over 30 minutes Q6W for 14 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo PET scan, CT scan, chest x-ray and/or MRI and blood sample collection throughout the study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years then every 6 months for 3 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
336
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo brachytherapy
Given IV
Undergo chest x-ray
Given IV
Undergo CT scan
Undergo EBRT
Undergo IMRT
Undergo MRI
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo PET scan
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
RECRUITINGCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, United States
RECRUITINGUCI Health - Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Ambulatory Care
Irvine, California, United States
Progression free survival (PFS)
Analysis will be performed using a one-sided log-rank test stratified by factors declared at randomization when (at least) 190 PFS events are observed in both arms. Patients will be grouped by their randomized treatment for intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, supported by patients in ITT population. Treatment hazard ratio and confidence will be estimated using Cox proportional hazard models specified with a main effect for the randomized treatment assignment and stratified by factors declared at randomization. PFS at 2 years will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for each arm.
Time frame: From randomization to time of progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, or date of last contact if neither progression nor death has occurred, up to 7 years
Overall survival (OS)
The OS treatment hypothesis test (Arm 2 versus \[vs.\] Arm 1) will be based on a 1-sided log-rank test, stratified by the factors specified at randomization. Comparisons of the OS distributions by treatment arm will be described using Kaplan-Meier methods. Treatment hazard ratio estimates and their 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using a multivariable proportional hazards model specified with main effects for the randomized treatment assignment (Arm 2 vs Arm 1) and stratified by the factors declared at randomization.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause, up to 7 years
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The nature, frequency, and degree of toxicity will be tabulated at the System Organ Class and AE-specific term levels. Tabulations will show the number and percentage of patients by maximum grade, within the treatment group received, regardless of the randomized treatment assignment. Differences in the level of toxicities by treatment arm will be assessed by classifying them as severe (grade 3 or higher) or not severe (grade 2 or lower) and examining the relative proportion of severe toxicities by Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Duration of concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) completion
Will be summarized and compared using 2-sample Wilcoxon rank sum tests. The proportion of patients with a delayed time to initiate CCRT by 2 weeks or more will be estimated and investigated by Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: From CCRT start date to CCRT end date
Number of cycles of cisplatin
Will be summarized and compared using 2-sample Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
Time frame: From 7 days after the last dose of induction chemotherapy to the CCRT start date for Arm 2, the planned CCRT start date to actual CCRT start date for Arm 1
Allostatic load
Will be summarized by treatment arm, and its association with OS will be evaluated using Cox PH model adjusted with main effects for the randomized treatment assignment (Arm 2 vs Arm 1) and stratified by the factors declared at randomization.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Tumor PD-L1 expression
The predictive value of tumor PD-L1 expression at baseline for PFS will be investigated using Cox PH model adjusted with main effects for the randomized treatment assignment (Arm 2 vs Arm 1) and stratified by the factors declared at randomization.
Time frame: At baseline
Circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid expression
Will be summarized by treatment arm and by collection time. Will be investigated using Cox PH model adjusted with main effects for the randomized treatment assignment (Arm 2 vs Arm 1) and stratified by the factors declared at randomization.
Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months post radiation therapy
Radiation quality pre-treatment score
Will be summarized by treatment arm, and its associations with PFS and OS will be evaluated using Cox PH model adjusted with main effects for the randomized treatment assignment (Arm 2 vs Arm 1) and stratified by the factors declared at randomization.
Time frame: At time of radiation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, United States
RECRUITINGCity of Hope Antelope Valley
Lancaster, California, United States
RECRUITINGUC Irvine Health/Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, United States
RECRUITINGCity of Hope South Pasadena
South Pasadena, California, United States
RECRUITINGCity of Hope Upland
Upland, California, United States
RECRUITINGUCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
RECRUITING...and 111 more locations