This is a prospective randomized clinical trial aiming to compare the success rate, complications, and insertion time between ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic vein (BCV) and internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The goal is to determine whether BCV access offers a safer or more effective alternative in critically ill patients requiring central venous catheter placement.
Central venous cannulation is a common and essential procedure in the management of critically ill patients, especially those requiring mechanical ventilation. Traditionally, the internal jugular vein (IJV) has been the preferred site. However, the brachiocephalic vein (BCV) has recently gained attention due to its potentially favorable anatomical location and reduced complication rates. This study is designed to compare the outcomes of ultrasound-guided cannulation of the BCV versus the IJV, focusing on parameters such as success rate of insertion on first attempt, total cannulation time, and incidence of complications such as arterial puncture, pneumothorax, or hematoma formation. The study will be conducted on adult patients admitted to the ICU and undergoing mechanical ventilation
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
For Arm ( candidates for BCV cannulation ) : by ultrasound guided we insert Central venous catheter in BCV under complete aseptic condition For Arm ( candidates for IJV cannulation ) by ultrasound guided we insert central venous catheter in IJV under complete aseptic conidtion we do comparison between the 2 arms as regard : 1st pass success rate , complications and failure rate in ventilated patient in ICU .
cannulation failure rate
Failure to cannulate selected vein at 1st attempt
Time frame: Baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.