Since 2019, long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Switzerland have been required by the Federal Insurance Law (KVG, Art. 59a) to report data for the calculation and public reporting of medical quality indicators (MQIs) in four clinical domains: polypharmacy, pain, malnutrition, and physical restraints. This data serves both for monitoring care quality at the national level through public reporting and for internal quality development. Contextual analysis showed that various quality development methods are already known and used in Swiss LTCFs. However, significant challenges remain: limited resources, time constraints, and restricted access to MQI data hinder effective use. Facilities reported a greater need for support in using MQI data. They also expressed interest in peer networking, structured support for applying quality methods (such as Plan Do Check Act cycles (PDCA)), and practical tools such as training, best-practice examples, and additional resources. Residents and relatives also expressed a strong interest in being more involved in decision-making and care quality discussions. The overall aim of the current study is to test a quality development training programme that supports LTCFs in using MQI data for continuous data-driven care quality development. The study is structured into three thematic areas: 1. MQI Results Literacy - Supporting LTCFs in interpreting MQI reports and benchmarks. 2. Impactful Actions - Supporting LTCFs to translate MQI results into concrete quality development actions using PDCA cycles. 3. Sparking Culture - Integrating data-driven quality development into everyday practice and fostering a culture of continuous development, with a strong emphasis on strengthening the involvement of residents, relatives, and leadership. The study follows a train-the-trainer strategy. Trainers instructed by the NIP-Q-UPGRADE research team provide structured training and coaching to Quality Leaders and management representatives of LTCFs. Quality Leaders then support their co-workers in quality development. The training programme consists of online and in-person trainings, training materials, practical tools, a website, guided tasks for facilities, and an email helpdesk for ongoing support. Study outcomes: This sub-study of the NIP-Q-UPGRADE programme aims to assess the acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and costs related to the training programme, both at the facility level and at the trainer level.
A one-group experimental study is performed including a multiple methods evaluation. Participants were recruited at two levels: * the trainers responsible for delivering the training to the Quality Leaders and the Managers from the long-term care facilities, * LTCF who test the training programme, select the Quality Leaders and Managers to participate in the training and who will elaborate and test a data-driven quality development project based on one MQI with the PDCA cycle within their facility. The external training providers have experience in training staff in long-term care facilities. They have been instructed by the research team (February 2025) on how to conduct the developed training for facility Quality Leaders and managers. The trainings are conducted in three languages all regions of Switzerland. The research team informs the training participants about the study and the data collection. At facility level, six to twelve LTCFs per Swiss language region (German, French and Italian speaking) were recruited between November and December 2024 (25 facilities in total over all language regions). At least two persons per facility will be trained between March and June 2025 to act as a Quality Leader or a Manager and perform tasks (1 full day in-person training and one peer-to-peer online meeting (2h) for managers; 2 full day in-person training onsite, two online workshops (3-4h), and two peer-to-peer online meetings (2x2h) for quality leaders. In LTCFs the investigators aim to collect data from the quality leaders, the managers, the direct care staff, the broader staff and the residents and relatives. All individual participants will be asked written consent for data collection. This study examines the tested "training and support programme" during a 3-months interval, from end of March until June 2025. Data will be collected between March 2025 and August 2025. At the training provider level Quantitative data: Activity logs: The costs of organizing and delivering the trainings will be assessed by using activity logbooks filled in continuously by the staff organizing and conducting the training (March to June 2025) Qualitative data: Group discussion: Acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and adaptations to the training and support material, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the training will be assessed through group discussions with the staff involved after each of the training sessions (March to June 2025, in total 21 interviews or group discussions, 7 per language region). At the long-term care facility level Staff level Quantitative data: Online survey: Acceptability, feasibility and fidelity will be assessed via surveys of involved staff at different levels in March 2025 (quality leaders and managers) and in June 2025 (quality leaders, managers, care staff and broader staff). The surveys will also ask for background information on the facilities and participants. Survey data will be collected in a secure online electronic data collection platform (REDCap). Activity logbooks: Costs associated with the implementation will be assessed by using activity logbooks filled in by the quality leaders and managers and salary categories. Qualitative data: Focus groups: Acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and adaptations to the toolkit, and barriers and facilitators to implementation will be assessed through focus group per language region per staff group mixing facilities: 1. 1 focus groups with quality leaders (June 2025, 1 per language region) 2. 1 focus groups with nurses and care staff exposed to the training and support program (June 2025, 1 per language region) Residents and relatives' level Qualitative data: Focus groups or interviews: Experiences, perceptions, expectations regarding their involvement in quality development during the pilot.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
The training and support program uses a train-the-trainer strategy. The research team: * develop training and support materials * organize an e-mail helpdesk support * organize and conduct the scientific examination The external training providers: \- train the management representatives and the quality leaders. The quality leader and the manager: * elaborate and test a quality development project based on one MQI with PDCA cycle * animate interprofessional meetings * organize a collective workshop with residents and relatives * engage residents and relatives in individual conversations by testing a brochure
Institut für Pflegewissenschaft - Nursing Science (INS), University of Basel
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Institute and School of Nursing La Source, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI)
Manno, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
Acceptability of the training and support program - Survey
Acceptability of the training and support components will be assessed in a survey with Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a 4-item instrument measuring the acceptability of an intervention with a total score (4-20): higher scores mean a better acceptability; through a survey targeting quality leaders, managers, care staff, and broader facility staff in participating facilities.
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS, MANAGEMENT, CARE AND BROADER STAFF: Month 3-4
Acceptability of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers
Acceptability of the training and support components will be assessed in qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers.
Time frame: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Acceptability of the training and support program - focus groups
Acceptability of the training and support components will be assessed in focus groups with quality leaders and care staff.
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Acceptability of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Acceptability of the training and support components will be assessed in semi-structured qualitative interviews with trainers after each training unit.
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Feasibility of the training and support program - Survey
Feasibility of training and support components will be assessed in a survey with Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a 4-item instrument measuring the feasibility of an intervention with a total score (4-20): higher scores mean a better feasibility ; through a survey targeting quality leaders, managers, care staff, and broader facility staff.
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS, MANAGEMENT, CARE AND BROADER STAFF: Month 3-4
Feasibility of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers
Feasibility of the training and support components will be assessed in qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers.
Time frame: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Feasibility of the training and support program - focus groups
Feasibility of the training and support components will be assessed in focus groups with quality leaders and care staff.
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Feasibility of the training and support program - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Feasibility of the training and support components will be assessed in qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers after each training unit.
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Implementation fidelity - survey
Degree of fidelity to each component (yes, partial, no) will be measured using a survey targeting quality leaders, managers, care staff, and broader facility staff.
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS, MANAGEMENT, CARE AND BROADER STAFF: Month 3-4
Implementation fidelity - qualitative interviews semi-structured with managers
Implementation fidelity of the training and support components will be assessed in qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers.
Time frame: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Implementation fidelity - focus groups
Implementation fidelity of the training and support components will be assessed in focus groups with quality leaders and care staff.
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Implementation fidelity - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Implementation fidelity of the training and support components will be assessed in qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers after each training unit.
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox - focus groups
Barriers to the implementation will be explored in focus groups with quality leaders and care staff, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR).
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews
Barriers to the implementation will be explored in qualitativ semi-structured interviews with managers, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR).
Time frame: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Barriers to the implementation will be explored in qualitativ semi-structured interviews with trainers after each training unit, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR).
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox - focus group
Facilitators to the implementation will be explored in focus groups with quality leaders and care staff, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR).
Time frame: LTCF QUALITY LEADERS & CARE STAFF: Month 3-4
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews
Facilitators to the implementation will be explored in qualitative semi-structured interviews with managers, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR).
Time frame: LTCF MANAGEMENT: Month 3-4
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox - qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers
Facilitators to the implementation will be explored in qualitative semi-structured interviews with trainers after each training unit, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR).
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-10, 12-13 (After each training unit)
Sum of costs associated with implementation of the toolkit in Swiss francs
Costs will be calculated based on time spent on implementation activities per staff group with corresponding hourly salary estimate, recorded in an activity logbook
Time frame: Monthly up to 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.