The goal of this randomized wait-list control study is to understand the relationship between ceremony and substance use (SU), SU risk (e.g., SU severity, depressive symptoms) and protective factors (e.g., spirituality, community support). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Will adults enrolled in Gii'igoshimong show improved SU outcomes compared to those in control groups? * Will self-relevant processing networks activated during stimulus engagement increase from pre- to post- engagement in ceremony and at 6-month follow-up? Researchers will compare adults that complete Gii'igoshimong with those that do not complete Gii'igoshimong to see if health outcomes are different. After completing baseline assessments, participants will be randomized to complete Gii'igoshimong now (intervention) or after the participants have completed the 1 month and 6-month post assessments (waitlist control). All participants (intervention and waitlist control) within a cohort will complete 1 month and 6 month post assessments at the same time.
This project seeks to engage American Indian (AI) adults with community and spiritual worldviews via ceremony (Gii'igoshimong). In doing so, the investigators will attempt to buffer the effects of historical trauma, personal trauma, and lifelong risk factors for substance use, thereby improving substance use behaviors, related outcomes, and overall health. The Community-Based Participatory Research will enroll AI adults (Aim 2 \& 3) to implement a randomized controlled trial (N = 300 target adults) with a wait-list design respectful of cultural norms of inclusion. The investigators will evaluate the relationship between ceremony and adult substance use and identify multilevel factors (i.e., psychosocial, neurocognitive) through which traditional practices convey protection against substance use. The investigators will assess and develop a menu of implementation strategies (Sub-aim 2) to support community priority of long-term sustainment of the ceremonial practice. TRIAL (Aim 2): An effectiveness trial where Gii'igoshimong will be tested in a randomized waitlist control trial with N = 300 participants. Once enrolled and consented into the trial, participants will complete baseline assessments. Once baseline assessments are complete, participants will be randomized into either intervention (ceremony) or control (wait-list). Intervention is an up to four-day ceremony, that was traditionally offered to every Anishinaabe person when the Anishinaabe person reached puberty. Today, this ceremony is being revived, and yet, accessibility to this ceremonial opportunity remains low. Ceremony will be described in more detail below. Both intervention and control arms will complete 1 month post and 6-month post assessments. Control arm participants will be offered the ceremony after completion of the 6-month assessments. POST-CEREMONY FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS (FGD) (Sub-aim 2) The investigators will conduct focus group discussions (FGDs) with ceremony treatment arm participants at six months post-baseline (6 total FGDs) to get participant feedback on the ceremony, thoughts on the effects of participation, and suggestions for strengthening implementation. KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWS (KII) (Sub-aim 2) The investigators will conduct key informant interviews (KIIs) with ceremony leaders at mid-trial to get feedback on ceremony implementation and suggestions for improving implementation moving forward. IMPLEMENTATION MAPPING FGD (Sub-aim 2) The investigators will conduct two sequential FGDs with ceremony leaders and other community leaders. In the first implementation mapping FGD, the investigators will present the results of the KIIs/FGDs that were done during the trial, outlining what the investigators think are the key issues/barriers to implementation of the ceremony in the community moving forward. The investigators will then facilitate a group discussion where the investigators try to reach consensus on those issues. After FGD 1, the investigators will (independently) try to come up with some strategies that the tribe could use to support implementation in the long-term. In FGD 2, the investigators will present these back to the same group and get feedback/try to seek consensus ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY (EEG) (Aim 3) The investigators will examine the neurocognitive effects of Gii'igoshimong ceremony and associated stimuli relevant to reducing substance use. This study will establish the measurement validity of electroencephalography/event related potential (EEG/ERP) indicators of self-referential processing and an indicator of cultural identification, a critical step in the science of delineating the potential of cultural factors as disease modifying processes. EEG assessments will be a required activity of the Trial. These assessments will be completed at the same time as Trial survey assessments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
300
Lifecourse ceremony led by Elders that used to be offered to everyone prior to colonization
Great Lakes Hub
Duluth, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGDays of substance use assessed by Timeline Follow Back (TLFB)
Days of substance use
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Flourishing Scale
Score range: 8-40; lower score means higher Positive mental health
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Late Positive Potential (LPP) quantified as the average EEG response in microvolts to adjectives in the Self-referential Processing Task
Larger magnitude LPP (i.e., higher microvolts) indicates larger attention engagement
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
Score range: 0-27; lower score is indicative of lower risk
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESDR-10)
Scale range: 0-40; lower score = lower depression
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Scale range: 7-28; lower scores indicates lower anxiety
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Self-rated (physical, mental, spiritual) health
Adapted from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview; Score ranges 1-5 for physical health; Score ranges 1-5 for mental health; Score ranges 1-5 for spiritual health; lower score is better
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.