This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ compared to the effectiveness of Standard of Care alone though a retrospective data collection.
This is a retrospective multi-center study collecting real world evidence on the use of Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ and Standard of Care alone in subjects with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs, and post operative wounds that have not healed with conventional therapy for greater than or equal to 4 weeks.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
Membrane Wrap™
Membrane Wrap™
Membrane Wrap-Hydro™
Athena Specialty Group
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Revive Advanced Wound Care
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Houston Foot and Ankle Care
Houston, Texas, United States
Houston Foot Dr
Houston, Texas, United States
Frequency of wound closure by or on week 16
Wound closure is defined as: Full epithelialization of the wound with the absence of drainage. Epithelialization is defined as a layer of epithelium visible on the wound surface
Time frame: 16 weeks
Wound improvement by or on End of Study (EOS) from baseline
Defined by: \>60% reduction in area, or \>60% reduction in depth, or \>75% reduction in volume
Time frame: 16 weeks
Incidence of wound recurrence within the 16-week study period
Incidence of wound recurrence within the 16-week study period
Time frame: 16 weeks
Mean number of wound free days within the 16-week study period
Mean number of wound free days within the 16-week study period
Time frame: 16 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Basic care involves debridement, along with local wound care depending on the wound needs. Debridement involves removal of fibrin and devitalized tissue from the base and the borders of the ulcer which is necessary in all treatment plans to reduce the risk of infection and promote healing.