Comparison of Wound Healing in Fistulectomy and Fistulectomy With Marsupialization

Central Park Medical College340 enrolled

Overview

The study was done at Central Park Medical College Lahore during January to September, 2024. Low fistula-in-ano patients were randomized into 2 groups i.e. Group A (SUR 1 fistulectomy) and Group B (170 patients in each group). The same surgical team applied all their procedures to reach spinal anesthesia. Wound infection determined after the operation was done clinically and verified by culture at 10 days of follow up. Statistical analyses based on SPSS version 26 were carried out and p \< 0.05 terminated as significant.

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Enrollment

340

Conditions

Wound Healing Fistulectomy Fistulectomy With Marsupialization Fistula in Ano

Interventions

Fistulectomy with Marsupialization

Patients with fistula in ano treated with Fistulectomy with Marsupialization and were compared for wound healing with other group

FistulectomyPROCEDURE

Patients with fistula in ano treated with Fistulectomy and were compared for wound healing with other group

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 70 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: Patients of either gender aged between 18-70 years presenting with fistula in-ano Exclusion Criteria: the patients with recurrent fistula, with anal fissures, chronic colitis and hemorrhoids

Locations (1)

Central Park Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Pakistan

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Assessment of wound healing

by employing southampton scale for assessment of wound healing scale; assessment of wound healing was done

Time frame: 6 weeks

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.