As of 2022, about 12% of children in Finland lived in poverty. Many of these families face not only a lack of money but also stress, low confidence in managing finances, and limited access to financial guidance. This study aims to support these families by improving their financial skills and well-being through a practical and research-based program. As of 2022, about 12% of children in Finland lived in poverty. These families often face not only financial hardship but also stress, low confidence in managing money, and limited access to financial guidance. The FinSoc study supports such families by improving financial skills and well-being through a practical, research-based program. The intervention includes five sessions with a trained social service professional, focusing on budgeting, financial decision-making, emotions around money, and the role of money in relationships. The goal is to reduce financial anxiety, improve knowledge, and build confidence in managing finances. The sessions also aim to help families talk more openly about money and set realistic financial goals. To test effectiveness, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. Families are randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving the FinSoc program) or a control group (receiving regular social work services and, after final measurements, a material package to promote financial capability). At least 88 participants-families with at least one child under 18 and facing financial difficulties-will take part. Information will be collected at three time points: before the intervention, after it ends, and three months later. Outcomes include financial literacy, financial anxiety, economic self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life, measured with self-rating scales in questionnaires. In addition to questionnaires, interviews will be conducted with a sample of families and social workers to explore their experiences-what worked, what could be improved, and how the sessions were received. This qualitative feedback will guide future development. Formative evaluation involves feedback from families before and after each session, covering topic clarity, session usefulness, and experiences with the techniques. For fidelity assessment, social workers will report after each session on adherence to the planned approach and tool use. The FinSoc program is offered through public and private social service providers. It was developed and is being implemented by an interdisciplinary team with expertise in financial social work, social policy, and mental health. The study aims to improve families' everyday lives, inform social work practices, and contribute to knowledge on social and economic well-being.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
88
Financial Social Work intervention (FinSoc) The FinSoc intervention is a structured financial social work program designed for families experiencing complex financial difficulties. It consists of five modules, each delivered in a one-on-one session with a trained social worker. The modules focus on key areas such as budgeting, emotional and relational aspects of money, financial decision making, building long-term financial capability. The intervention aims to reduce financial anxiety, strengthen economic self-efficacy, and support overall wellbeing. Motivational interviewing techniques and client-centred approaches are used throughout to encourage active participation and goal-setting.
Univeristy of Turku
Turku, Finland
RECRUITINGFinancial Literacy Scale
The primary outcome variable, financial literacy, is measured using an adapted version of the Financial Literacy Questionnaire developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In this study, only items related to financial behaviour are included. Financial literacy is thus assessed using four statements: (1) 'Before I buy something, I carefully consider whether I can afford it'; (2) 'I pay my bills on time'; (3) 'I keep a close personal watch on my financial affairs'; and (4) 'I set long-term financial goals and strive to achieve them.' Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The total score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater financial literacy.
Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre-randomization, 2) within 1 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement
Economic Self-Efficacy
Economic self-efficacy is measured using the Scale of Economic Self-Efficacy, which consists of ten items rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater economic self-efficacy.
Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre-randomization, 2) within 1 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement.
Financial Anxiety
Financial anxiety is assessed using the Financial Anxiety Scale (FAS), which consists of eight items rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally untrue) to 4 (totally true). The total score ranges from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater financial anxiety.
Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre randomization, 2) within 1 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement.
Health related quality of life
Health-related quality of life is measured using the full Health-related quality of life is measured using the full Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale (11 items; PROMIS Global Health v1.2). The scale includes six items scored from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent), with a total possible raw score range of 6 to 30; three items with question-specific 1-5 scales, yielding a combined score range of 3 to 15, where higher scores reflect better health; and one item assessing pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Thus, higher scores on the first nine items indicate better outcomes, while the pain item is reverse-coded so that higher values represent worse outcomes.
Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre-randomization, 2) within 1 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.