This study investigates newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients following standard of care treatment. The primary endpoint of the study is to determine minimal residual disease (MRD) by combining 2 techniques in order to better predict progression free survival (PFS) of a patient. Secondary endpoint is to gain more insight into diagnostic features to better stratify patients based on risk factors for early relapse. Both endpoints could lead to a more patient specific treatment in the future. Participants will be followed throughout their standard of care treatment. This treatment consists of indcution chemotherapy, followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy. * Before start of induction chemotherapy the patient will receive a whole-body FDG PET/LDCT scan and an additional bone marrow aspirate sample will be taken during a routine bone marrow punction. This sample will be used for whole exome sequencing (WES). * For those patients who achieve at least a very good partial response (VGPR) after induction chemotherapy and ASCT a repeat whole body FDG PET/LDCT scan will be performed before start of maintenance therapy. This scan will be repeated for a third time after 1 year of maintenance therapy. Besides this, an additional bone marrow aspirate sample will be taken for MRD detection. This will be done before start of maintenance therapy, after 1 year of maintenance therapy and after 2 years of maintenance therapy. MRD detection is done by next generation flow cytometery (NGF). * During mantenance therapy patient follow-up will be performed at least every 3 months to determine best response to therapy or possible relapse (based on routine lab information). * Those patients who do not achieve VGPR or better will not need to receive a whole body FDG PET/CT scan and MRD detection by flow cytometry, but these patients will undergo the same follow-up during maintenance therapy. * In case of relapse, for all patients, an additional bone marrow aspirate sample will be taken for WES (during a routine bone marrow investigation).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
Universitair ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
RECRUITINGUniversitair ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, Oost Vlaandere, Belgium
RECRUITINGUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
RECRUITINGAZ Sint-Jan Brugge
Bruges, West-Vlaandere, Belgium
RECRUITINGPrognostic value of MRD assessment by FDG-PET combined with NGF in patiënts achieving VGPR or better after induction chemotherapy and ASCT
The investigators hypothesize that only patients who have no evidence of disease on both NGF and FDG-PET (MRD double negative) have a durable response with a 2y PFS of 90% compared to 50% in patients who have evidence of disease on at least one modality (MRD positive). PFS is defined as the time from achieving ≥ VGPR and confirmation of absence of MRD (landmark) to first documentation of objective progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The \<10\^-5 MRD level is used to define BM-NGF MRD negativity. A Deauville score = 3 threshold will be used to define FDG-PET MRD negativity, but alternatives will also be evaluated (other DS, more quantitative measures like SUV).
Time frame: From achieving VGPR and measuring MRD by FDG PET/CT and NGF until the patiënt received 2 years of maintenance therapy (or until detection of progressive disease or dead, whichever occurs first).
Improvement of risk stratification at baseline - based on WES
The secondary endpoint is to implement WES and Radiomics at baseline to improve risk-stratification. Looking at WES-analysis: WES at baseline will be correlated with PFS duration, in order to explore wether certain WES signatures are correlated with shorter or longer PFS.
Time frame: From diagnosis until progression, death or end of follow-up period (2years of maintenance therapy).
Improvement of risk stratification at baseline - based on radiomics
The secondary endpoint is to implement WES and Radiomics at baseline to improve risk-stratification. Lookting at radiomics: PET radiomics will be perforemd and correlated with PFS duration. Is there a significant difference (higher/lower) between patients with a PFS of \>24 months vs patients who show PD during maintenance therapy (PFS \< 24 months).
Time frame: From diagnosis until progression, death or end of follow-up period (2years of maintenance therapy).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.