Crick
HomeTrialsGenesDrugs23andMeGraphBlogContact
  • Home
  • Trials
  • Genes
  • Drugs
  • 23andMe
  • Graph
  • Blog
  • Contact
Crick

An open-source clinical intelligence platform. Explore clinical trials, gene networks, and molecular structures using public data sources.

Data Sources

  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • OpenTargets
  • ClinVar
  • PubChem

Links

  • Contact
  • Privacy

© 2026 Crick. All rights reserved.

Crick is for educational purposes only. Not medical advice.

Endoscopic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement Versus Conventional Approach in the Treatment of Early Phase Acute Pancreatitis

N/ANot Yet RecruitingNCT07093996
Almazov National Medical Research Centre200 enrolled

Overview

The planned multicenter randomized study is aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting in adult patients with acute pancreatitis. It is planned to include patients with early-stage nonbiliary pancreatitis in the study.

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement is used to treat a variety of pancreatic diseases, including chronic pancreatitis, Wirsung duct strictures, pseudocysts in disconnected duct syndrome and as a preventive measure after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Despite the obvious progress, the greatest number of unsolved problems remain in the issues of using this manipulation in patients with acute pancreatitis. In particular, the perspectives of the pancreatic duct stent placement in treatment of acute pancreatitis early stages remain controversial. On the one hand, the installation of a stent in the early acute pancreatitis stages helps to normalize the outflow of pancreatic juice from the pancreas and reduce intraductal pressure, leading to a beneficial effect, as evidenced by a number of researchers. On the other hand, stent placement may partially block the second-order pancreatic ducts or increase the risk of sterile pancreatitis contamination due to the development of reflux. In addition, one should not forget about a number of post-manipulation complications inherent in this procedure, including bleeding from the area of the major duodenal papilla, perforation of the duodenum, progression of pancreatic necrosis and cholangitis. Finally, the timing and indications for early endoscopic stenting of the pancreatic duct are not currently standardized, largely due to the fact that acute pancreatitis is a pathological condition that is difficult to predict. Thus, although this manipulation seems perspective, due to the lack of evidence base, it is currently difficult to recommend it for use in wide clinical practice. The planned multicenter randomized study is aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting in adult patients with acute pancreatitis. It is planned to include patients with early-stage nonbiliary pancreatitis in the study.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

200

Conditions

Acute Pancreatitis (AP)

Interventions

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placementPROCEDURE

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement will be performed with a 5Fr Boston Scientific pancreatic stent (3-4 cm in length) within 24 hours from the randomization procedure. The stent will be removed on the 5th day after installation.

Conventional treatment of acute pancreatitis in early phaseDRUG

Infusion therapy, pain relief, nutritional support and surgical procedure if needed

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years
Medical Language ↔ Plain English
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis confirmed on the basis of at least 2 of the 3 diagnostic criteria according to the revised Atlanta classification 2. Presence of organ failure signs (moderate and severe pancreatitis) 3. Informed consent of the patient Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of other indications for endoscopic intervention on the major duodenal papilla (biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis, calculus of the major duodenal papilla, stenosis of the major duodenal papilla, etc.) 2. Previous surgical interventions on the major duodenal papilla 3. Diverticula of the major duodenal papilla 4. Pregnancy 5. Shock 6. Coagulopathy (INR\>1.5, blood platelets \< 50\*109/l

Locations (7)

Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Hangzhou, China

City Clinical Hospital No. 4

Perm, Russia

Almazov National Medical Research Centre

Saint Petersburg, Russia

The City Hospital of the Holy Martyr Elizabeth

Saint Petersburg, Russia

I.I. Dzhanelidze research institute of emergency medicine

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Mariinskaya Hospital

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Volgograd State Medical University

Volgograd, Russia

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mortality rate

Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Secondary Outcomes

Incidence of complications associated with endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement

Frequency of duodenal bleeding, duodenal perforation, unsuccessful major duodenal papilla canulation etc. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Time frame: From endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement to 3 months

Rate of different pancreatic necrosis models

Will be evaluated according CT-imaging: Model 1 - volume of pancreatic necrosis \< 30%, or not determined Model 2 - volume of pancreatic necrosis 30-50%, located in the distal pancreatic part Model 3 - volume of pancreatic necrosis 30-50% located in the proximal part Model 4 - volume of pancreatic necrosis 30-50% and more with separation of viable proximal and distal parts (disconnected duct syndrome) Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Time frame: From enrollment to the 7th day of treatment

Average Balthazar computed tomography severity index (0-10)

A scoring system used to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis based on computed tomography scans. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of mean.

Time frame: From enrollment to the 7th day of treatment

Average SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score) score (0-24)

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of mean

Time frame: From enrollment to the 7th day of treatment

Incidence of other surgical interventions

Frequency of other surgical interventions, such as abdominal drainage, retroperitoneal drainage, lumbotomy, laparotomy. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Number of participants with other surgical interventions

Number of other surgical interventions, such as abdominal drainage, retroperitoneal drainage, lumbotomy, laparotomy

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Length of hospital stay

Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of length of hospital stay in days

Time frame: From date of hospitalization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months

Number of participants with manifestation of diabetes mellitus

Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Central Contacts

Pavel A Kotkov, MD

CONTACT

89062619231Kotkovdr@mail.ru

Badri V Sigua, PhD

CONTACT

89111979343dr.sigua@gmail.com
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.