Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With or Without Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Overview

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) with and without hysterectomy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse is a condition that affects many women and can significantly reduce quality of life. Laparoscopic lateral suspension is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to correct this condition. In some cases, the uterus is preserved, while in others, hysterectomy is performed at the same time. The study retrospectively evaluates patients who underwent laparoscopic lateral suspension, either with or without hysterectomy, at SBÜ Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital. Medical records were reviewed to collect information about surgery duration, anatomical success (measured by the POP-Q system), complication rates, blood loss, hospital stay, and recurrence rates. The goal of this study is to determine whether performing a hysterectomy during laparoscopic lateral suspension has a significant effect on surgical outcomes. The findings may help guide surgical decision-making and improve treatment strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at SBÜ Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) with and without concomitant hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). POP is a prevalent condition that significantly affects quality of life, and LLS is increasingly performed as a minimally invasive approach that allows either uterine preservation or hysterectomy. A total of 87 patients treated between 2021 and 2024 were analyzed: 43 underwent LLS with total laparoscopic hysterectomy, and 44 underwent uterus-preserving LLS. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected from electronic medical records, operative reports, and follow-up documentation, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Outcome measures included POP-Q scores, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, perioperative complications, recurrence, pelvic pain, and urinary incontinence. The analysis showed that both groups achieved significant anatomical improvement, with no significant differences in recurrence, pelvic pain, or urinary incontinence. However, hysterectomy was associated with longer operative times, increased blood loss, and longer hospital stays. Vaginal length was better preserved in uterus-preserving procedures. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. These findings indicate that adding hysterectomy to LLS increases surgical burden without conferring additional anatomical or functional benefit. Uterus-preserving LLS appears to be a safe and effective option in appropriately selected patients, supporting shared decision-making in pelvic reconstructive surgery.