The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the EndoScell Scanner (ES) imaging system can accurately assess tumor-free surgical margins during surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), compared with standard frozen-section pathology. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is ES non-inferior to intraoperative frozen-section pathology in identifying positive or negative tumor margins? * Does ES shorten the time needed for margin assessment and reduce the number of additional tissue resections required? Researchers will compare an ES-assisted surgical arm with a conventional frozen-section arm to see if ES improves margin accuracy, shortens operative time, and increases the rate of complete (R0) tumor removal. Participants will * undergo standard AEG resection with randomized assignment to either ES or frozen-section margin checks; * allow collection of margin tissue samples for ES, frozen-section, and final paraffin pathology; * attend routine follow-up visits for up to 2 years to monitor for local recurrence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
314
EndoSCell Scaner (ES) is a new type of intraoperative cell-level fluorescence-guided imaging technology that can be used for direct and rapid intraoperative tissue cell interpretation. This technology uses a handheld cell microscope system to magnify local tissue by about 1280 times, and can perform rapid real-time scanning and imaging of in vivo or excised ex vivo tissue.
Accuracy
Using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, the accuracy of ES system and frozen pathology for AEG resection margin was evaluated: Accuracy Rate = true positive + true negative/total number of samples.
Time frame: intraoperative
Evaluation of R0 resection rate
The proportion of surgical resection specimens without residual tumor at the resection margin using paraffin pathology as the gold standard.
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
Positive margin rate
Using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, the proportion of ES interpretation as positive but frozen pathology showing negative
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
Evaluation of the actual resection margin distance during ES-assisted AEG
Evaluation of the actual resection margin distance during ES-assisted AEG
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ES technology
Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ES technology
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
Evaluation of the consistency between ES technique and frozen pathology
Evaluation of the consistency between ES technique and frozen pathology
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
Postoperative recurrence: evaluate the anastomotic recurrence rate at 6, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery
Postoperative recurrence: evaluate the anastomotic recurrence rate at 6, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery
Time frame: 6, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery
Evaluation of the time efficiency of ES and frozen pathology
ES real-time interpretation time vs frozen pathology result time
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
Evaluate the number of timely adjustments to the resection range due to the interpretation of ES technology;
Evaluate the number of timely adjustments to the resection range due to the interpretation of ES technology;
Time frame: 7days after the surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.