Safety and efficacy of EDEE (EUS-directed transenteric ERCP)
Background and Study Objective Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the gold standard when biliary intervention is indicated. However, there are situations where conventional ERCP is no longer feasible - for example, in the presence of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Additionally, the number of patients with surgically altered anatomy due to benign or malignant underlying diseases is increasing. For this group of patients, enteroscopy-assisted ERCP can generally be considered. However, the success rate of this procedure varies depending on the anatomical situation and is only around 61.7%. Therefore, patients in whom the papilla or the biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) cannot be reached either via conventional endoscopy or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP - yet require biliary intervention - present a particular clinical challenge. Traditionally, the only option in such cases has often been percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTBD). This approach frequently requires repeated procedures over several months and, in some cases, results in a permanent external drainage. In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided techniques have emerged as a promising treatment option for this patient population. These methods show a high technical success rate of approximately 90%, but are not suitable in cases requiring complex interventions (e.g., multiple strictures of the BDA) or when targeting the right biliary system. An alternative approach involves a two-step procedure: first, an EUS-guided entero-enteric anastomosis is created using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS); in a second step, ERCP is performed via the LAMS. This procedure is referred to in the literature as Endoscopic Ultrasound-Directed Transenteric ERCP (EDEE). Since only a few systematic studies on this alternative procedure have been published so far, the objective of this retrospective study is to assess the technical and clinical success rates and evaluate the safety of EDEE.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Technical aspects of EUS-guided anastomosis and ERCP via LAMS (Lumen apposing metal stent)
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany
RECRUITINGTechnical success rate
number an rate of patients with successful creation of gastro-enterostomy followed by successfull ERCP via LAMS (lumen apposing metal stent) including all planned interventions
Time frame: during the procedure
Safety of EDEE
number and rate of patients, in whom a procedure related complication occured
Time frame: during the procedure
Clinical success rate
absence of need for alternative drainage
Time frame: at the day of last procedure
Technical aspects of gastro-enterostomy
Evaluation of devices and potential pitfalls creating a gastroenterostomy
Time frame: during the procedure
Techinical aspect of ERCP via LAMS
Evaluation of devices and potential pitfalls performing ERCP via LAMS
Time frame: during procedure
Requirement for reinterventions
Time frame: during the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Enrollment
40