The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine in third molar removal surgery under general anesthesia in healthy volunteers. The main question aims to determine whether there is any difference in vital signs, hemostasis and postoperative pain between ropivacaine and bupivacaine in patients undergoing third molars extraction under general anesthesia. Researchers will compare bupivacaine and ropivacaine in a split-mouth study to determine if one drug is more effective in third molar extraction surgery under general anesthesia (better hemostasis, less postoperative pain, and fewer changes in vital signs). Participants will undergo a single surgical procedure and complete the Visual Analog Scale to record postoperative pain
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Injection of bupivacaine 0,5% in group A
Injection of ropivacaine 0,75% in group B
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
RECRUITINGEvaluate if there is a significant difference between groups in postoperative analgesic capacity using Visual Analog Scale, intraoperative hemostasis and in vital signs during anesthesia.
The Visual Analog Scale (0-10 VAS) can be interpreted as no pain (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6),severe (7-9),or worse pain (10)
Time frame: From surgery to 7 postoperative days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.