The purpose of the study is to identify the optimal dose level of NP-G2-044 in combination with standard of care (SOC) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), and to compare the efficacy and safety of NP-G2-044+PLD vs. PLD alone in participants with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).
This is an open-label, Phase 2/3, multicenter, randomized study of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD vs. PLD alone in participants with PROC. The Phase 2 component of the study includes a safety lead-in dose escalation of NP-G2-044 monotherapy with twice daily (BID) dosing and a dose escalation phase for NP-G2-044+PLD followed by a randomized dose optimization phase of NP-G2-044+PLD compared with PLD. In the Phase 3 component of the study, participants will be randomized to treatment with NP-G2-044+PLD, at the dose selected from the dose optimization phase, or to PLD alone. Randomized participants will be stratified according to the number of prior lines of therapy, number of prior PLD therapy lines, and region of the world. The study population is women at least 18 years of age with confirmed ovarian high grade serous carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0-1, and whose cancer is resistant to platinum-based therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
380
HonorHealth Cancer Care
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
RECRUITINGTrials365
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Part A (Dose escalation): Number of participants with adverse events (AEs)
The safety and tolerability of NP-G2-044 monotherapy with BID dosing and in combination with PLD will be evaluated
Time frame: From first dose until Safety Follow-up (30 days ±7 days after last dose of NP-G2-044) Approximately 2 years
Part A (Dose escalation): Number of participants with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
The safety and tolerability of NP-G2-044 monotherapy with BID dosing and in combination with PLD and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of NP-G2-044 when combined with PLD will be determined
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Part B (Dose Optimization): Number of participants with AEs
The safety and tolerability of the treatment groups will be compared.
Time frame: From Day 1 until Safety Follow-up (30 days ±7 days after last dose of NP-G2-044) Approximately 2 years
Part B (Dose Optimization): Overall response rate (ORR)
The optimal dose of NP-G2-044 combined with PLD will be evaluated. The ORR is defined as the proportion of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (Approximately 2 years)
Part B (Dose Optimization): Progression free survival (PFS)
The optimal dose of NP-G2-044 combined with PLD will be evaluated. The PFS is defined as time from randomization until adequately documented disease progression based on blinded independent committee review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (Approximately 2 years)
Part C (Phase 3): Progression free survival (PFS)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Utah Cancer Specialists
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity Of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
RECRUITINGThe efficacy of NP-G2-044 when combined with PLD vs. PLD alone will be compared. The PFS is defined as time from randomization until adequately documented disease progression based on BICR per RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (Approximately 3 years
Part A (Dose Escalation) and Part C (Phase 3): Overall response rate (ORR)
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. The ORR is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or PR.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (For Part A: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation): Progression free survival (PFS)
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. The PFS is defined as time from start of treatment until adequately documented disease progression based on local assessment of imaging studies, or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (For Part A: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Cancer antigen-125 (GCIG CA-125) criteria for response
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. A response according to CA-125 has occurred if there is at least a 50% reduction in CA-125 levels from a pretreatment sample. The response must be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. Participants can be evaluated according to CA-125 only if they have a pretreatment sample that is at least twice the upper limit of normal and within 2 weeks prior to starting treatment. The date when the CA-125 level is first reduced by 50% is the date of the CA-125 response. To calculate CA-125 responses accurately, the following rules apply: 1) Intervening samples and the 28-day confirmatory sample must be less than or equal to (within an assay variability of 10%) the previous sample. 2) Variations within the normal range of CA-125 levels will not interfere with the response definition.
Time frame: From Screening to survival follow-up (until progression, death, or withdrawal of consent) (For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Overall survival (OS)
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. The OS is defined as time from start of treatment until death.
Time frame: From randomization until death For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Disease control rate (DCR)
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. The DCR is defined as the proportion of participants with confirmed CR, PR or stable disease (SD).
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Duration of response (DOR)
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. The DoR is defined as the time from first CR or PR to disease progression or death in participants who achieve CR or PR.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first (For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Metastasis-free interval (MFI)
The initial efficacy of NP-G2-044 in combination with PLD will be evaluated. The MFI is defined as the time from start of treatment to confirmed occurrence of new metastasis.
Time frame: From treatment initiation to confirmed occurrence of new metastasis (For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation) and Part C (Phase 3): Number of participants with AEs
The safety and the tolerability of the treatment groups will be compared.
Time frame: From Day 1 until Safety Follow-up (30 days ±7 days after last dose of NP-G2-044) For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Participant reported outcomes based on European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer Module 28 (EORTC QLQ-OV28)
The treatment groups for participant reported Quality of life (QoL) will be compared. The EORTC QLQ-OV28 will evaluate the QoL with respect to ovarian cancer. The EORTC QLQ-OV28 is specific for ovarian cancer and consists of 28 items. Each scale was scored from 0 to 100 with higher scores on the symptom scales indicating greater symptom burden.
Time frame: At screening, every 3 cycles starting Cycle 1 Day 1 (each Cyle is 28 days) For Part A and B: (Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Participant reported outcomes based on European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions -5 Levels (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L)
The treatment groups for participant reported QoL will be compared. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire assess health outcome from a wide variety of interventions on a common scale. It is comprised of 5 dimensions where each dimension has 5 levels. A higher score represents a worse outcome.
Time frame: At screening, every 3 cycles starting Cycle 1 Day 1 (each Cyle is 28 days) (For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation), Part B (Dose optimization) and Part C (Phase 3): Participant reported outcomes based on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI)
The treatment groups for participant reported QoL will be compared. The FOSI 8-item questionnaire measures response to treatment based on symptom assessment. The FOSI total score ranges from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 32 (asymptomatic).
Time frame: At screening, every 3 cycles starting Cycle 1 Day 1 (each Cyle is 28 days) (For Part A and B: Approximately 2 years; Part C: Approximately 3 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation) and Part B (Dose optimization): Terminal half-life (T1/2) of NP-G2-044 and PLD
The T1/2 of NP-G2-044 as a monotherapy with BID dosing and NP-G2-044 and PLD as combination therapy will be evaluated.
Time frame: From Day 1 to End of treatment (Approximately 2 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation) and Part B (Dose optimization): Time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of NP-G2-044 and PLD
The Tmax of NP-G2-044 as a monotherapy with BID dosing and NP-G2-044 and PLD as combination therapy will be evaluated.
Time frame: From Day 1 to End of treatment (Approximately 2 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation) and Part B (Dose optimization): Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of NP-G2-044 and PLD
The Cmax of NP-G2-044 as a monotherapy with BID dosing and NP-G2-044 and PLD as combination therapy will be evaluated.
Time frame: From Day 1 to End of treatment (Approximately 2 years)
Part A (Dose Escalation) and Part B (Dose optimization): Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of NP-G2-044 and PLD
The AUC of NP-G2-044 as a monotherapy with BID dosing and NP-G2-044 and PLD as combination therapy will be evaluated.
Time frame: From Day 1 to End of treatment (Approximately 2 years)