This multicenter prospective cohort study aims to evaluate whether a \>50% decrease or normalization of both quantitative fecal immunochemical test (qFIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels at 2 weeks after starting conventional therapy (mesalazine or corticosteroids) can predict clinical relapse or need for biologic/JAK inhibitor therapy escalation by 52 weeks in biologic-naive patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). Secondary objectives include assessing predictive value at 4 weeks, building dynamic prediction models, conducting health economic evaluation (Number Needed to Test, NNT), and exploring baseline predictors of early biomarker response. Patients will be observed during standard care with stool samples collected at Weeks 0, 2, and 4. Biomarker results will be blinded to clinicians/patients until study completion.
This is a prospective, observational cohort study conducted across multiple centers in China. Biologic-naive UC patients (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore ≥2) initiating conventional therapy (mesalazine or corticosteroids) will be enrolled. Stool samples for quantitative FIT (qFIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC) will be collected at Baseline (Week 0) , Week 2 (±3 days) , and Week 4 (±3 days) . Patients are classified at Week 2: Group A (Rapid Responders): Both qFIT \& FC decrease \>50% from baseline OR normalize. Group B (Slow/Non-Responders): Either qFIT or FC decrease ≤50%. The primary endpoint is the composite event rate (clinical relapse OR treatment escalation to biologics/JAK inhibitors) by Week 52 (±2 weeks) . Clinical relapse is defined as an increase ≥2 points in partial Mayo score (excluding endoscopy) with a rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 requiring therapy adjustment. Treatment escalation occurs per standardized criteria (steroid-refractoriness or dependence). Secondary endpoints include time-to-event, corticosteroid-free remission, mucosal healing at Week 52, predictive model performance (AUC, sensitivity, specificity), NNT calculation, and baseline predictors.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
FC and FIT TEST at WEEK0 2 4
Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Composite Endpoint Rate (Clinical Relapse OR Treatment Escalation)
Proportion of patients experiencing either: 1) Clinical Relapse: Increase ≥2 points in partial Mayo Score (stool frequency + rectal bleeding + PGA) with rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 requiring therapy adjustment, OR 2) Treatment Escalation: Initiation of any biologic agent (e.g., infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab) or JAK inhibitor due to steroid-refractoriness (failure to respond by Week 4) or steroid-dependence (relapse during/after steroid taper within 3 months) as per standardized protocol.
Time frame: From enrollment to Week 52 (±2 weeks)
Time to First Composite Endpoint Event
Time frame: From enrollment to Week 52 (±2 weeks)
Proportion with Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission
Partial Mayo Score ≤1 point without corticosteroid use for ≥4 weeks.
Time frame: Week 52 (±2 weeks)
Diagnostic Performance (AUC) of Week 2 Biomarker Response
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for the Week 2 qFIT+FC combined response (Group A vs B) in predicting the Week 52 composite endpoint.
Time frame: Week 2 prediction assessed at Week 52
Number Needed to Test (NNT)
NNT = 1 / \[Event Rate (Group B) - Event Rate (Group A)\] for the composite endpoint at Week 52.
Time frame: Week 52 (±2 weeks)
Diagnostic Performance (AUC) of Biomarker Change Slope Models
AUC of logistic regression models using the rate of change (Δ/week) of FC and/or qFIT from Week 0 to Week 2 and/or Week 0 to Week 4 for predicting the Week 52 composite endpoint. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV will also be calculated.
Time frame: Weeks 0-2 and Weeks 0-4 slopes assessed at Week 52
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.