Propofol is the most popular IV anaesthetic agent used for induction, however one of its known side effects is causing pain on injection, the gold standard method in preventing this pain is using lidocaine prior to injecting propofol. multiple drugs have been investigated to reduce the aforementioned pain, however there has been no study comparing lidocaine to parecoxib, an NSAID.
Propofol is the most popular drug used for induction of anaesthesia. without prophylaxis, 60 to 70% of patients are affected by pain upon injection, with varying degrees of severity. The specific mechanism triggering pain is undetermined, but it is thought to be due to triggering of kallikrein-kinin cascade when it is injected. Many strategies have been investigated to reduce the severity of this pain, with the most effective being the use of a large vein to deliver the drug, combined with pretreatment using lidocaine with venous occlusion to allow it to anaesthetize the vein locally. This approach has been shown in a large meta-analysis to be the gold standard for reducing pain caused by propofol injection, achieving up to an 80% reduction in incidence. However, this method is not widely used clinically, probably due to the extra time required to anaesthetize the vein and applying a tourniquet. On the other hand, using lidocaine as a pre- treatment or mixed with propofol has been shown to reduce pain on injection. Multiple other agents have been investigated with the aim of preventing the pain caused by propofol injection, such as opioids and ketamine. Non-steroidal Anti inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) have also been studied, with the rationale that reducing prostaglandin production caused by the suggested cascade above. These medications are usually used as part of the multimodal analgesia delivered to the patient to prevent intraoperative and postoperative pain, if given prior to propofol, they may have the added benefit of reducing the pain caused by injecting propofol. Parecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor in the NSAIDs class, has been investigated recently in trails to prevent pain on injection caused by propofol, where a prospective Randomised controlled trial showed that a dose of 40 mg was effective in reducing the frequency and the severity of the pain, where the incidence of pain was only 26%, compared to 58% in the placebo group. Furthermore non of the patients in this group reported moderate or severe pain. In the same study, a 20 mg Dose was only shown to reduce the severity of pain and not the incidence. The Investigators propose this study to compare the two interventions as no previous study has investigated them in the same setting. Objective of the study. To compare the efficacy of intravenous parecoxib versus lidocaine in reducing pain during propofol injection in adult ASA I-II patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
30
it will be given as a pretreatment prior to injection of propofol, with a tourniquet applied.
atients in this group will receive IV parecoxib 40 mg (the standard full dose for an adult) diluted to a total volume of 5 mL with normal saline.
incidence of pain on injecting propofol after receiving the treatment assigned.
Time frame: immediately after injection of 50 mg of propofol.
Severity of pain.
Measured Via Visual analogue scale for pain. The patient will be given 50 mg of propofol and asked if there is any pain, and the severity of the pain. The severity of pain will be graded on the scale between 1 and 10, 10 being the most severe in the scale, and 1 is the minimal pain experienced.
Time frame: immediately after injection of propofol.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.