Currently, clinicians are unable to predict a patient's risk of long-term disease progression and development of a long-term complication based on the data that is available to them. The first aim of this is to develop and validate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered prediction model for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) disease progression using existing data from previously collected studies and real-world electronic health medical data. Investigators will use clinical, pharmacologic, and genomic factors to develop the prediction model based on the most relevant clinical outcomes of change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the development of a microvascular complication. Despite the availability of newer medication options, lifestyle intervention is not effective in most youth and current therapeutic options are ineffective at producing sustained glycemic control. Newer and innovative methods are needed to identify the youth at highest risk of progression in terms of increase in HbA1c and development of long-term complications and to motivate behavioral change in youth. The goal of this aim is to create an AI-powered digital twin model for 50 youth with T2D using their baseline clinical, genetic, pharmacologic and lifestyle data and utilize AI algorithms developed in Aim 1 to simulate disease progression and treatment response. Investigators will then evaluate the digital twin model in an randomized controlled trail and prospectively compare the generated digital twin data to observed values over one year. Investigators will also measure whether knowledge of the digital twin prediction with targeted healthcare recommendations influence medication and lifestyle change adherence in the digital twin arm (n= 25) compared to the control arm (n= 25).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Participants in the digital twin arm will receive information on their disease progression which will be based on projected change in HbA1C in alternative realities and specific recommendations on medication dosing and lifestyle changes based on this data. The digital twin information will be presented on an iPad in a game- like manner. The alternate realities will include scenarios of change in medication adherence, physical activity metrics, dietary changes etc.
Participants in the control arm will receive standard of care which is medication change recommendations based on HbA1C and blood glucose values every 3 months and standard lifestyle education.
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Pediatric Diabetes Clinic
Oakland, California, United States
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco, Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes
San Francisco, California, United States
Change in HbA1C
The primary outcome will be the ability of the digital twin model to accurately predict longitudinal disease progression measured as the digital twin predicted HbA1C versus measured HbA1C and the difference in HbA1C between the digital twin arm and control arms.
Time frame: From enrollment to the close out visit at the 1-year mark
Sleep Quality
Change in measures related to sleep quality. (Actigraph measured duration, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)). Respondents rate each element of the questionnaire using Likert-type scales. Responses can range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more acute symptoms of insomnia. Scores are tallied and can be compared both to scores obtained at a different phase of treatment and to the scores of other individuals. A total score of: 0-7 indicates "no clinically significant insomnia" 8-14 means "sub-threshold insomnia" 15-21 means "clinical insomnia (moderate severity)" 22-28 means "clinical insomnia (severe)"
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
Psycho-Social Outcome
Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Quality of Life. (PedsQL-Diabetes Module). The Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Diabetes Module scores quality of life in children and adolescents with diabetes using a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. The PedsQL Diabetes Module uses a 5-point response scale (0-4) for each item. It assesses various aspects of life affected by diabetes, including physical symptoms, treatment barriers, and emotional well-being.
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
Sugar Intake
Change in measures related to sugar intake (g/day).
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
Physical Activity
Change in measures related to physical activity (days/week)
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
BMI
Change in BMI (BMI z-score).
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
CGM Time In Range
Change in CGM based measures including time in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL.
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
CGM Time Above Range
Change in CGM based measures including time above the target glucose range of greater than 250 mg/dL for glucose and co-efficient of variation of glucose.
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
Psycho-Social Outcome
Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Diabetes Distress. (Diabetes Distress Scale). Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) is used to assess the level of emotional distress related to managing diabetes. * Individual Item Score: Each item on the DDS is rated on a 6-point scale. * Minimum: 1 (not a problem) * Maximum: 6 (a very significant problem) * Total Score: The DDS yields an overall distress score calculated by averaging the responses to the individual items. * Minimum: 1 * Maximum: 6 * Interpretation of Scores: * \< 2.0: Little or no distress * 2.0-2.9: Moderate distress * ≥ 3.0: High distress
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
Psycho-Social Outcome
Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Overall QOL and Wellbeing using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health questionnaire. * PROMIS Global Health is a broader measure of overall physical and mental health. * PROMIS Global Health scores are reported as T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the US general population. * Higher T-scores indicate better physical and mental health. A score of 60 is one standard deviation above the mean, while 40 is one standard deviation below the mean.
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
Psycho-Social Outcome
Change in measures related to psycho-social outcomes for Overall QOL and Wellbeing using the World Health Organization- Five (WHO-5) questionnaire. * Measures well-being, specifically positive psychological states. * It consists of five statements relating to the past two weeks. * Aims to assess the subjective experience of well-being, capturing feelings of positive mood, energy, and interest. A short, 5-item questionnaire. * Typically uses a 6-point Likert scale for each item, with higher scores indicating better well-being.
Time frame: From time of enrollment to the study close out visit at the 1-year mark
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.