Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects 5% of the global population and is the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the widespread use of antidepressants, 50-60% of patients do not respond adequately after 8 weeks of treatment. Insomnia, present in approximately 85% of individuals with MDD, is a frequent and persistent symptom that contributes to poor treatment outcomes. Targeting insomnia has been shown to enhance both symptom remission and functional recovery. In this context, combined therapeutic strategies are often used to optimize the antidepressant response. Among them, chronotherapeutic approaches, such as light therapy and prolonged-release melatonin, have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects and are beneficial in regulating sleep and circadian rhythms. Light therapy shows an efficacy comparable to antidepressants and, when used in combination with them, can double treatment effectiveness. Melatonin is also recommended in the management of depression-related insomnia. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 2x2 factorial design aims to evaluate the efficacy of two chronotherapeutic interventions, 8 weeks of active light therapy and 2 mg of prolonged-release melatonin-administered alone or in combination, on depressive symptom reduction at 8 weeks in adult patients with MDD and comorbid insomnia. The primary outcome is the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to week 8. All participants will receive antidepressant treatment and sleep hygiene education. This study proposes a novel therapeutic strategy combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to address both depression and insomnia, with the goal of improving outcomes, especially for the 40% of patients who do not adequately respond to antidepressants alone.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects approximately 5% of the global population and represents the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the availability of pharmacological treatments, particularly antidepressants, their efficacy remains limited: nearly 50 to 60% of patients do not respond adequately after 8 weeks of treatment. One of the most common and persistent symptoms in MDD is insomnia, which affects about 85% of patients and frequently persists even after partial improvement of mood symptoms. Insomnia is not only a residual symptom but also a marker of poor prognosis and treatment resistance. Addressing sleep disturbances directly has been shown to enhance both symptomatic and functional remission in depression, making it a promising target for intervention. In clinical practice, combination strategies are increasingly employed to improve therapeutic response, particularly in patients who are only partially responsive to antidepressant medication. Among these strategies, chronotherapeutic interventions, such as light therapy and prolonged-release melatonin, offer a compelling approach. These treatments have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects, with some studies reporting clinical improvements as early as the first week of treatment. Additionally, both interventions are known to positively influence sleep quality and circadian rhythm regulation, which are often disrupted in depressive disorders. Light therapy (LT), in particular, has shown efficacy comparable to that of antidepressants and works by synchronizing the sleep-wake cycle. When used in combination with antidepressants, LT has been associated with significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than antidepressants alone. Similarly, prolonged-release melatonin has been recommended in the management of insomnia comorbid with depression, further supporting the rationale for combining these chronotherapeutic agents. This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed in a 2x2 factorial format. It aims to evaluate the efficacy of two chronotherapeutic interventions, active light therapy (10,000 lux) for 8 weeks and 2 mg prolonged-release melatonin for 8 weeks, administered alone or in combination, in improving depressive symptoms at 8 weeks. The trial will enroll adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe MDD and comorbid insomnia. The primary objective is to assess the change in depressive symptom severity, measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, from baseline to week 8. All participants, regardless of group allocation, will receive standard antidepressant treatment and structured sleep hygiene counseling to ensure a consistent baseline of care. This approach reflects real-world practices and enhances the ecological validity of the trial. The study also incorporates objective and subjective measures of sleep and circadian rhythms to explore the broader impact of the interventions. By evaluating the combined and individual effects of light therapy and melatonin alongside standard care, this study seeks to establish an innovative and comprehensive therapeutic model. The goal is to improve outcomes for individuals with MDD and insomnia, particularly the substantial proportion of patients, up to 40%, who do not achieve adequate response with antidepressants alone. This trial represents a significant step toward more personalized, effective, and integrated treatment strategies for depression.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
184
Patients will receive an SSRI antidepressant (e.g., Fluoxetine, Sertraline, Paroxetine, Escitalopram) or SNRI (e.g., Venlafaxine, Duloxetine) antidepressant (as clinically appropriate), combined with sleep hygiene education, daily morning LT (10,000 lux for 30 minutes between 7-8 a.m. using the Dayvia Slim Style 3 lamp), and 2 mg of extended-release melatonin taken one hour before bedtime, all for a duration of 8 weeks.
Patients will receive an SSRI or SNRI, sleep hygiene instructions, daily morning bright LT (10,000 lux, 30 cm, 30 min, 7-8 a.m., using Dayvia Slim Style 3 lamps), and placebo melatonin taken one hour before bedtime, all for a duration of 8 weeks.
Patients will receive an SSRI or SNRI, sleep hygiene instructions, daily placebo light exposure (\<10 lux, 30 cm, 30 min, 7-8 a.m., using Dayvia Slim Style 3 lamps in non-therapeutic mode), and 2 mg of extended-release melatonin taken one hour before bedtime, all for a duration of 8 weeks.
Patients will receive an SSRI or SNRI, sleep hygiene instructions, daily placebo light exposure (\<10 lux, 30 cm, 30 min, 7-8 a.m., using Dayvia Slim Style 3 lamps), and oral placebo melatonin taken one hour before bedtime, all for a duration of 8 weeks.
Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard
Paris, France
Assessment of the efficacy of two chronotherapeutics (LT and extended-release melatonin 2mg), alone or combined, associated to AD on depressive symptoms reduction after 8 weeks of treatment
Measure the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score between the inclusion visit (V0, S0) and Week 8 (V3, S8) in patients with moderate to severe major depressive episode and insomnia
Time frame: At baseline (Week 0) and at Week 8
Assessment of the efficacy of chronotherapeutics, combine or alone, on depressive symptoms evolution
Measure changes in MADRS scores from baseline (inclusion visit) to each follow-up visit (Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, and Month 3).
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Determination of the rate of therapeutic response to chronotherapeutics at each follow-up visit
Proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in MADRS score at each follow-up visit (Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Month 3) as compared to baseline (inclusion visit)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Determination of the rate of remission in depressive symptoms
Proportion of patients with MADRS score ≤10 at specified time points (Weeks 4, 8 and Month 3).
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of the impact of chronotherapeutics on subjective sleep
Assessment using self-reported sleep questionnaires, sleep-wake rhythm diaries, and sleep logs
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of the impact of chronotherapeutics on circadian rhythm
Assessment using self-reported sleep questionnaires, sleep-wake rhythm diaries, and sleep logs
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of changes in objective sleep measured by actigraphy
Total sleep time
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective sleep measured by actigraphy
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective sleep measured by actigraphy
Fragmentation index
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective sleep measured by actigraphy
Sleep efficiency
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective sleep measured by actigraphy
Time in bed
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in sleep rhythm parameters measured by actigraphy
Total Sleep Time
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in sleep rhythm parameters measured by actigraphy
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in sleep rhythm parameters measured by actigraphy
Fragmentation Index
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in sleep rhythm parameters measured by actigraphy
Sleep Efficiency
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in sleep rhythm parameters measured by actigraphy
Time in Bed
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective actigraphy-derived sleep and rhythm parameters
Relative amplitude
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective actigraphy-derived sleep and rhythm parameters
Interdaily stability/variability
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of changes in objective actigraphy-derived sleep and rhythm parameters
L5/M10 onset markers
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Modeling of the longitudinal trajectory of MADRS scores
Analyze the slope of MADRS score changes across visits to characterize symptom progression or improvement.
Time frame: From baseline to Week 8 and from baseline to Month 3
Measurement of time to therapeutic response
Time (in days) from inclusion to achievement of ≥50% reduction in MADRS score.
Time frame: From baseline to Month 3
Evaluation of the tolerability of chronotherapeutic combinations
Evaluate adverse events using the PRISE-M side effects questionnaire.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, and 8
Evaluation of mood state
Scores on YMRS (mania)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of mood state
C-SSRS (suicidal ideation)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of mood state
QIDS-SR (depression)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of mood state
GAD-7 (anxiety)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of mood state
CGI (clinical global impression)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of global functioning evolution
Scores on YMRS (mania)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of global functioning evolution
C-SSRS (suicidal ideation)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of global functioning evolution
QIDS-SR (depression)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of global functioning evolution
GAD-7 (anxiety)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
Evaluation of global functioning evolution
CGI (clinical global impression)
Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 8, and Month 3
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.