This European multicenter observational study aims to evaluate the real-world use, timing, and outcomes of lymphatic interventions in patients with congenital heart disease and/or primary lymphatic disorders. The study will examine the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging and interventional techniques, such as lymphatic embolization, in improving clinical symptoms, biomarkers, and fluid-related complications. The central question is whether early diagnosis and targeted intervention can lead to clinically meaningful improvements and reduced need for reintervention. Data collected retrospectively and prospectively from participating centers will help identify predictors of outcome, assess disease severity, and inform standardized diagnostic and therapeutic pathways across Europe.
This is a prospective, multicenter observational study with retrospective components. The study population includes patients who have undergone or are undergoing lymphatic imaging diagnostics and lymphatic interventions at participating centers across Europe. Patients are included both retrospectively (from medical records) and prospectively as part of their routine clinical care.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
This intervention was made as part of their clinical treatment.
Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark
RECRUITINGChange in Symptoms Following Lymphatic Intervention, assessed by:
Patient-reported or physician-assessed symptoms (e.g., cough, diarrhea, dyspnea) will be categorized as normalized, improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline. Unit of Measure: Symptom status category (normalized / improved / unchanged / worsened)
Time frame: From time of treatment to yearly follow-up up to 5 years.
Change in Objective Biomarkers Following Lymphatic Intervention
Objective clinical findings (e.g., serum albumin level, lymphocyte count, fluid accumulation) will be categorized as normalized, improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline. Unit of Measure: Biomarker status category (normalized / improved / unchanged / worsened)
Time frame: From time of treatment to yearly follow-up up to 5 years.
Composite improvement:
≥50% reduction in presenting symptoms and/or ≥20% improvement in key biomarkers (e.g., serum albumin, lymphocyte count etc.).
Time frame: From time of treatment to yearly follow-up up to 5 years.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.