This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an imageless navigation system in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) on a traction table for reducing functional limb length discrepancy (LLD) compared with conventional techniques. Seventy-two patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing THA between March 1, 2021 and September 30, 2021 were included. Functional LLD was assessed using a preoperative block test. Participants were assigned to the navigation or conventional group based on patient preference. Outcomes included operative parameters, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, limb length measurements, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.
This single-center prospective comparative study was conducted at the Joint Reconstruction Center of China Medical University Hospital between March 1, 2021 and September 30, 2021. Eligible participants were adults diagnosed with advanced hip osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or developmental dysplasia of the hip requiring THA. Exclusion criteria included prior hip joint infection, severe LLD requiring additional reconstructive procedures, significant spinal pathology affecting spinopelvic balance, or radiographs inadequate for measurement. All procedures were performed via the direct anterior approach (DAA) on a traction table by the principal surgeon. Functional LLD was assessed preoperatively using a block test, with wooden blocks (5 mm increments) placed under the heel until the patient reported equal leg lengths. Patients in the navigation group underwent THA with an imageless navigation system (Stryker OrthoMap Versatile Hip Navigation) to record intraoperative limb length change and acetabular cup positioning; the conventional group underwent standard THA without navigation. Primary outcome was the patients' expectation gap (PEG), defined as the difference between preoperative functional LLD and postoperative radiographic limb length change. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative fluoroscopy time, WOMAC scores at baseline, 3 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively, and the proportion of outliers (PEG \> 10 mm). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of China Medical University Hospital (CMUH112-REC1-149). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
72
Patients underwent total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach using a computer navigation system to assist in intraoperative limb length measurement.
Patients underwent total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach conventionally.
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 台中市, Taiwan
Patients' Expectation Gap (PEG)
Difference between preoperative functional leg length discrepancy (measured with block test, mm) and postoperative radiographic leg length change (mm).
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative) and 3 months postoperatively
Surgeons' Expectation Gap (SEG)
Difference between intraoperative navigation leg length measurement (mm) and postoperative radiographic leg length change (mm).
Time frame: Intraoperative and 3 months postoperatively
Outlier Rate (>10 mm PEG)
Percentage of patients with Patients' Expectation Gap greater than 10 mm.
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
WOMAC Pain Score Change
Change in WOMAC pain subscale score (0-20, lower scores indicate less pain) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively
WOMAC Stiffness Score Change
Change in WOMAC stiffness subscale score (0-8, lower scores indicate less stiffness) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively
WOMAC Function Score Change
Change in WOMAC function subscale score (0-68, lower scores indicate better function) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 weeks postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively
Fluoroscopy Execution Time
Duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy use (seconds).
Time frame: Intraoperative
Operative Time
Duration of total surgical procedure (minutes).
Time frame: Intraoperative
Blood Loss
Total intraoperative blood loss (milliliters).
Time frame: Intraoperative
Length Change
Difference in radiographic leg length pre- and postoperatively (mm).
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months postoperatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.