From Conflict to Family Trauma

Overview

This project will examine the experience of the researcher as expert in the family court dealing with questions regarding family units, in conflict and children, victims of the family conflict, victims of abuse and neglect, often repeated over time.After the first consultation, family conflict often recurs, without regard for the treatment received, returning to the civil courts and sometimes to the criminal courts. There are three possibilities at this point, following the first decision of the court (a) there is a separation that resolves conflicts and leads to an improvement in outcomes for the children concerned; (b) pre-existing conditions specific to the children concerned continue, and the decision of the court regading separation has no effect; (c) conflict between the parents continues, with repeated returns to the civil courts, failure of processes of mediation and negotiation, and continuing or exacerbated trauma to the child leading to worse outcomes; (d) where there is a worse outcome, this may be due to the lack of supports following the expert psychological assessment and recommendation to the court..The forensic evaluation of the family often refers the family to public health services for therapeutic interventions and social supports. The lack of these interventions and supports of public health services may exacerbate the family trauma. This may occur (a) because the family conflict continues in the absence of the interventions and supports; (b) because the family trauma is exacerbated by continuing court proceedings because the conflict between parents concerning the care and placement of the children leads to prolonged legal proceedings and may result in worse outcomes for the children, such as criminal behaviour as this struggle continues. The child is 'instrumentalised', used as a pawn or weapon in the struggle between the parents. The research project aims first of all to outline, on the basis of the data to be acquired, (a) whether there is evidence that the decision of the court guided by the expert opinion and recommendations has a beneficial effect on outcomes for the child; (b) specific lines of treatment intervention and better packages of care and support to enhance good outcomes and minimise or prevent these adverse outcomes, under the supervision of the judge.

This research project aims, to analyze the current practices and processes and to hypothesize possible support systems or the possibility of using existing resources with an element of training for clinicians, staff and experts. Detailed Description This research project aims, to analyze the current practices and processes and to hypothesize possible support systems or the possibility of using existing resources with an element of training for clinicians, staff and experts.Furthermore, this research project aims to understand if certain characteristics of the members of the family unit or of the family unit as a system statistically influence the outcome of the treatment; understand if there is a need to create different support strategies for extreme conflict; to mobilise the support of lawyers, in order to actively involve them in the research project and together with the lawyers and the social services, find resolution strategies for this problem. The project includes two phases of implementation:The first will concern, in agreement with the Ministry of Justice, the local public health and social services, the University and the Puglia Region Authority, the detection, starting from time T0 of all the family units that access the judicial system for the resolution of family disputes for which the assistance of an expert consultant is necessary to support the Judge in managing the dispute; this will include all the judicial offices belonging to the District of the Court of Appeal of Bari; the support will be sought of the specialist lawyers in the field who will join the research project and direct access to the files of the various Courts.This first phase, lasting a total of eighteen months, includes an initial period dedicated preliminarily to training/information on the data collection methods of the judicial office staff, jurists and experts of the public services involved in the research.