The goal of this study is to evaluate whether peroneal electrical nerve stimulation (PNS) using the TOMAC™ device is a feasible, acceptable, and safe non-pharmacologic intervention for managing Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) during pregnancy. This pilot study will also collect preliminary information on symptom relief, sleep quality, and maternal-fetal safety associated with device use. The main questions the study aims to answer are: Is TOMAC™ PNS a feasible and acceptable intervention for RLS in pregnant individuals? Are there any maternal, fetal, or neonatal safety concerns with PNS use during pregnancy? What are the patterns of adherence, tolerance, and usability of the TOMAC™ device in this population? Participants will: Use a non-invasive TOMAC™ peroneal nerve stimulator during 30-minute sessions as needed, for 8 weeks. Complete questionnaires assessing feasibility, acceptability, symptom severity, and sleep quality (including AIM, IAM, FIM, IRLS, PGI-I, PSQI, ESS, FOSQ, and MOS-II). Wear an actigraphy monitor to collect objective sleep data at baseline and at 4 weeks. Attend scheduled follow-up visits and phone check-ins for maternal vital signs, uterine contraction and fetal monitoring, and neonatal outcome assessment. This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolling 15 pregnant participants between 21 and 26 weeks' gestation. Findings will provide the first dataset on the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of TOMAC™ PNS in pregnancy and inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial.
This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study designed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary safety of TOMAC™ peroneal electrical nerve stimulation (PNS) for the treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) during pregnancy. RLS affects approximately 20-30% of pregnant individuals, with symptoms often worsening during the second and third trimesters. It is associated with disrupted sleep, decreased quality of life, and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, prolonged labor, and increased cesarean delivery rates. Pharmacologic therapies for RLS are generally avoided during pregnancy because of limited data on fetal safety, highlighting the need for effective, non-pharmacologic alternatives. The TOMAC™ system is a non-invasive, wearable, high-frequency peroneal nerve stimulator that delivers bilateral stimulation to the common peroneal nerves. It is FDA De Novo granted for use in adults with moderate to severe RLS but has not been evaluated in pregnant populations. Safety rationale for this study is informed by evidence from other neuromodulation therapies, such as sacral nerve stimulation, which have been used safely during pregnancy without observed maternal or fetal harm. Primary objectives are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of TOMAC™ PNS using validated implementation measures, including the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Secondary objectives include assessment of adherence, dose tolerance, usability, maternal and fetal safety, and exploratory evaluation of symptom improvement and sleep quality through the International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problem Index II (MOS-II). Fifteen pregnant individuals between 21 and 26 weeks of gestation with a confirmed diagnosis of RLS will be enrolled. Following baseline assessments, participants will undergo an in-person titration session under clinical supervision, which includes uterine contraction and fetal monitoring performed at ≥28 weeks' gestation to ensure maternal and fetal safety. Participants will then use the TOMAC™ device at home for an 8-week intervention, performing self-administered 30-minute sessions as needed, preferably during periods of symptom distress or prior to sleep. Data will be collected from patient-reported outcomes, actigraphy sleep recordings, device usage logs, and maternal-fetal safety monitoring. Follow-up includes biweekly phone check-ins, an in-person mid-study visit at week 4, a final in-person visit at week 8, and a three-month postpartum safety follow-up. This pilot study will generate the first prospective data on the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of peroneal nerve stimulation in pregnancy, providing foundational evidence for future randomized controlled trials evaluating TOMAC™ PNS as a pregnancy-safe, non-pharmacologic treatment for RLS and its potential to improve maternal sleep and pregnancy outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
The TOMAC™ system is a non-invasive, wearable peroneal nerve stimulator that delivers high-frequency electrical stimulation to the common peroneal nerves at the fibular head. It is FDA-cleared for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) in adults but has not been studied in pregnancy. In this trial, pregnant participants will undergo an in-clinic titration session with uterine contraction and fetal monitoring at ≥28 weeks' gestation to determine comfortable therapeutic intensity. They will then use the device at home for 8 weeks, up to four 30-minute sessions daily, prioritizing periods of high symptom burden or before bedtime. Outcomes will assess feasibility, acceptability, adherence, symptom improvement, sleep quality, and maternal-fetal safety.
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
RECRUITINGAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a validated 4-item questionnaire assessing participants' perceptions of how acceptable the intervention is. Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks of intervention
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Score
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a validated 4-item questionnaire assessing participants' perceptions of how appropriate the intervention is for their condition. Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 of intervention
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Score
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a validated 4-item questionnaire assessing participants' perceptions of how feasible it is to use the intervention. Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 of intervention
Adherence to Maximum Allowed Device Sessions
Adherence will be measured as the proportion of actual device sessions used compared to the maximum allowed use (as many as needed 30-minute sessions for 8 weeks). Data will be collected from device logs and participant diaries. Results will be reported as the percentage of completed sessions relative to the maximum allowable sessions.
Time frame: Throughout 8 weeks of intervention
Mean Session Duration
Average duration of each stimulation session, recorded by device logs. Results will be reported in minutes per session.
Time frame: Continuous during 8-week intervention
Mean Stimulation Voltage Used During Device Sessions
Average stimulation voltage delivered by the peroneal nerve stimulation (PNS) device during participant sessions, recorded from device logs. Results will be reported as mean voltage across all sessions.
Time frame: Continuous during 8-week intervention
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Number of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events related to device use, as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Results will be reported as total number of participants.
Time frame: Throughout 8-week intervention
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Number of participants experiencing serious adverse events related to device use, as assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results will be reported as total number of participants.
Time frame: Throughout 8-week intervention
Change in Maternal Systolic Blood Pressure
Maternal systolic blood pressure measured at in-clinic visits using automated sphygmomanometer. Results will be reported as mean change in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Change in Maternal Diastolic Blood Pressure
Maternal diastolic blood pressure measured at in-clinic visits using automated sphygmomanometer. Results will be reported as mean change in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Change in Maternal Heart Rate
Maternal heart rate measured at in-clinic visits using automated sphygmomanometer. Results will be reported as mean change in beats per minute (bpm).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Incidence of Uterine Irritability During Titration
Proportion of participants who experience uterine irritability during the in-clinic titration session (≥28 weeks gestation). Uterine irritability is defined per protocol as ≥10 contractions within a 20-minute period, measured using external tocodynamometry. Results will be reported as percentage of participants.
Time frame: At ≥28 weeks of pregnancy during titration session
Incidence of Fetal Distress During Titration
Proportion of participants who experience fetal distress during the in-clinic titration session (≥28 weeks gestation). Fetal distress is defined as one or more of the following: * FHR bradycardia \<110 bpm for ≥10 minutes * FHR tachycardia \>160 bpm for ≥10 minutes * Minimal/absent variability (\<5 bpm amplitude for ≥20 minutes) * Recurrent decelerations (≥3 late or variable decelerations in 20 minutes) Results will be reported as percentage of participants.
Time frame: At ≥28 weeks of pregnancy during titration session
Incidence of Uterine Irritability Associated With Fetal Distress
Proportion of participants who experience both uterine irritability (≥10 contractions in 20 minutes) and concurrent fetal distress during the same titration session, as defined above. Results will be reported as percentage of participants.
Time frame: At ≥28 weeks of pregnancy during titration session
Infant Birth Weight
Infant birth weight measured at delivery. Results will be reported in grams.
Time frame: At delivery
Neonatal Apgar Score at 1 Minute
Neonatal Apgar score assessed at 1 minute after delivery. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better neonatal condition. Results will be reported as mean score.
Time frame: At delivery (1 minute)
Neonatal Apgar Score at 5 Minutes
Neonatal Apgar score assessed at 5 minute after delivery. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better neonatal condition. Results will be reported as mean score.
Time frame: At delivery (5 minutes)
Neonatal Health Outcomes at 3 Months Postpartum
Proportion of infants with adverse health outcomes, including but not limited to growth restriction, feeding difficulties, recurrent hospitalizations, or clinician-diagnosed developmental concerns. Outcomes will be reported as percentage of infants, based on maternal report confirmed by pediatric/OB medical records.
Time frame: 3 months postpartum
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.