Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a common health condition that reduces quality of life and increases disability. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has shown positive effects on pain perception, beliefs, and function, especially when combined with physical activity. This randomized controlled trial will compare the effectiveness of delivering PNE during aerobic exercise on a cycle ergometer versus aerobic exercise alone in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: PNE during aerobic exercise (experimental group), Aerobic exercise alone (control group). Both groups will perform supervised cycling sessions lasting 20-30 minutes at light intensity (Borg CR10 = 3, 40-50% HRmax). The experimental group will simultaneously receive interactive education about pain mechanisms, central sensitization, and self-management strategies, supported by visual aids and metaphors delivered by a therapist during cycling. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and after the intervention, including: Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), Pressure pain threshold (algometry), Functional performance (Sit-to-Stand test), Safety and comfort (Likert scale), The study will enroll 24 participants (12 per group). The findings are expected to clarify whether integrating education with exercise provides superior benefits compared to exercise alone, offering an innovative, safe, and cost-effective strategy for managing chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Objective To determine whether PNE delivered during cycling exercise produces greater improvements in pain intensity, pain thresholds, and functional outcomes than aerobic exercise alone. Study Design This is a single-center, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms (1:1 allocation). A total of 24 participants with chronic low back pain will be recruited from the Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Randomization will assign 12 participants to the experimental group and 12 to the control group, using the Randomization software (www.randomization.com). The random sequence will be determined prior to the start of the initial assessments and will only be known to an external research assistant with no access to participant characteristics. The assignment will remain hidden and stored in the cloud until the end of the intervention and the collection of all study data. When a participant enrolls in the study, the external research assistant will inform the therapist of the assigned intervention group. Intervention Experimental group (PNE + exercise): 20-30 minutes of supervised cycling at light intensity (Perceived exertion, Borg CR10 = 3) while receiving interactive PNE. Education covers neurobiology of pain, central sensitization, and self-management, supported by visual aids and metaphors. Control group (exercise alone): 20-30 minutes of supervised cycling at the same intensity (Perceived exertion, Borg CR10 = 3), without educational content. Sample Size and Analysis Based on prior effect sizes, 28 participants (14 per group) provide sufficient power to detect moderate differences. Data will be analyzed with mixed-model ANOVA (time × group) and additional parametric or nonparametric tests as appropriate. Statistical significance is set at p \< 0.05. Ethical Considerations The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Participants will provide informed consent before participation. Risks are minimal (fatigue or mild discomfort), while expected benefits include improved pain understanding, reduced pain intensity, and improved function. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
24
Participants will cycle on an ergometer for 20-30 minutes at light intensity (Borg CR10 = 3; 40-50% HRmax). During cycling, they will receive interactive pain neuroscience education delivered by a therapist, including neurobiology of pain, central sensitization, and self-management strategies. Visual aids and metaphors will be used to facilitate understanding.
Participants will perform 20-30 minutes of supervised cycling on an ergometer at light intensity (Borg CR10 = 3; 40-50% HRmax). No educational content will be provided. Sessions will include warm-up, main phase, and cool-down, matched in duration and intensity to the experimental group.
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Chile
Change in Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale, 0-10)
Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). The primary endpoint is the change score (post-session minus baseline). Higher scores indicate greater pain.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-session) and immediately post-intervention (within 30 minutes)
Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (kgf) by Algometry
Baseline (pre-session) and immediately post-intervention (within 30 minutes)
Time frame: Pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be measured at the most symptomatic lumbar region using a handheld algometer. Pressure is increased at a constant rate until the participant first perceives pain; the value (kgf) is recorded. The outcome is the change s
Change in Functional Performance (30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test)
Baseline (pre-session) and immediately post-intervention (within 30 minutes)
Time frame: Participants sit on a standard chair (≈43 cm height) with arms crossed and stand up/sit down as many times as possible in 30 seconds. The total number of full stands is recorded. The outcome is the change in repetitions from baseline.
Safety and Comfort Ratings (Likert Scales)
Participants rate statements such as "I felt physically comfortable during the session" and "The environment felt safe to exercise" on 5-point Likert scales. Higher scores reflect greater perceived safety/comfort.
Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (within 30 minutes)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.