Preliminary clinical trial results indicate that Aβ-targeting monoclonal antibody drugs can delay disease progression more effectively. However, some patients still progress slowly to the moderate stage during treatment despite maintaining low Aβ/tau pathological protein loads. For such cases, patients and their families are fully informed about the potential lack of efficacy with continued treatment, and the decision is left to their discretion. Information regarding whether treatment is continued is documented and followed up to determine whether sustained benefits can be achieved. Previous further studies on lecanemab suggest that patients with low or absent tau pathology derive more significant clinical benefits, though large-sample validation remains lacking. This project will therefore enroll patients at clinical stages 3-4 (0.5 ≤ CDR ≤ 1) and monitor those progressing to moderate AD (CDR = 2) during monoclonal antibody therapy. Using tau pathology stratification, the study aims to identify which AD patients are most suitable for monoclonal antibody treatment and evaluate whether therapy continuation yields sustained benefits in patients progressing to moderate dementia, as well as whether patient selection should integrate both pathological (a-c stage) and clinical diagnoses.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
Lecanemab Injection Concentrate Solution (active ingredient at 100 mg/mL) is provided as a sterile aqueous solution containing 100 mg/mL of Lecanemab, 50 mmol/L citric acid, 350 mmol/L arginine/arginine hydrochloride, and 0.05% (w/v) polysorbate 80, with a pH of 5.0, and each vial is capable of being drawn into a volume of 5 mL. Lecanemab is to be administered via intravenous infusion over 60 minutes in saline solution. Lecanemab must be administered using an infusion system that includes a terminal 0.22 μM inline filter. The dosage of Lecanemab is 10 mg/kg.
Conventional anti-dementia treatment: Early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients routinely take cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil for treatment.
Aβ-PET centiloid values
Statistical Comparison of Lecanemab versus Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Based on Aβ-PET Centiloid Scores
Time frame: Baseline, 18 months
Change from Baseline in the CDR at 18 Months
Assessment of the Statistical Difference in CDR Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups
Time frame: Baseline, 18 months
Change from Baseline in the MMSE at 18 Months
Assessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in MMSE Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups
Time frame: Baseline, 18 months
Change from Baseline in the MoCA at 18 Months
Assessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in MoCA Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups
Time frame: Baseline, 18 months
Change from Baseline in the NPI at 18 Months
Assessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in NPI Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups
Time frame: Baseline, 18 months
Blood AD molecular pathology
Assess statistically significant difference in score between Lecanemab treatment group and Conventional anti-dementia treatment using Plasma AD biomarkers (Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40, T-tau, P-tau181, P-tau231, P-tau217, NFL levels)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.