This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment substudy tests the addition of olutasidenib to usual treatment in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a mutation in the IDH1 gene. Olutasidenib blocks the protein made by the mutated IDH1 gene. Blocking this protein may help keep cancer cells from growing. For patients with MDS, olutasidenib will be added to decitabine-cedazuridine (also called ASTX727). Decitabine is in a class of medications called hypomethylating agents and is the standard treatment for MDS. It works by helping the bone marrow produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. The cedazuridine makes it possible to take the decitabine by mouth. Adding olutasidenib to the usual treatment for MDS (ASTX727) may increase the likelihood of going into remission. For patients with AML, olutasidenib and ASTX727 will be combined with venetoclax, a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. Venetoclax may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking BCL-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Adding olutasidenib to the usual treatment for AML (ASTX727 and venetoclax) may increase the likelihood of going into remission. For low risk MDS, the substudy tests whether giving olutasidenib alone helps improve blood counts.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative composite complete response (CRc) (CR + CR with partial hematological recovery \[CRh\] + CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\]), based on multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), in older adults with IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with decitabine and cedazuridine (ASTX727), venetoclax (VEN), and olutasidenib compared to ASTX727 plus VEN, within 4 cycles of treatment. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) II. To assess the CR rate (including CR equivalent), using the modified International Working Group (IWG) 2023 response criteria, for patients with IDH1-mutant high-risk (HR)-MDS treated with ASTX727 plus olutasidenib compared to ASTX727 alone. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) III. To assess the rate of hematologic improvement (HI), using the IWG 2018 response criteria, for patients with IDH1-mutant low risk (LR)-MDS treated with olutasidenib. (Cohort C: IDH1-mutant LR-MDS) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the rate of CR and composite CR (CR, CRh, CRi) by treatment arm. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) II. To compare the rate and duration of transfusion independence by treatment arm. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) III. To compare the event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), early mortality, and overall survival (OS) by treatment arm. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) IV. To estimate the frequency and severity of toxicities by treatment arm. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) V. To compare the clearance of IDH1 mutation in bone marrow by treatment arm. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) VI. To compare the correlation between MRD clearance (including MFC and molecular MRD) and survival (including OS and EFS) by treatment arm. (Cohort A: IDH1-mutant AML) VII. To compare the rate of composite CR (CR \[or CR equivalent\] + CR with lesser hematological recovery \[CRL\] \[CR with unilineage recovery (CRuni), CR with bilineage recovery (CRbi)\] + CRh) using the modified IWG 2023 response criteria for patients with IDH1-mutant HR-MDS treated with ASTX727 plus olutasidenib compared to ASTX727 alone. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) VIII. To compare the overall response rate (ORR; defined as CR \[or CR equivalent\] + partial response \[PR\] + CRL \[CRuni, CRbi\] + CRh + HI) using the modified IWG 2023 response criteria for each treatment arm. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) IX. To compare the rate and duration of transfusion independence by treatment arm. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) X. To compare the time to response and duration of response (DoR) by treatment arm. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XI. To compare the EFS and OS of patients by treatment arm. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XII. To estimate the frequency and severity of toxicities by treatment arm. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XIII. To compare the rate of patients bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) by treatment arm. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XIV. To compare the clearance of IDH1 mutation, in bone marrow by treatment arm and correlation with survival (including OS and EFS) (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XV. To compare ORR, EFS, and OS by treatment arm stratified by the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (IPSS-M) prognostic scoring system. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XVI. To estimate the rate of CR, median EFS, and median OS in patients who do not achieve CR with ASTX727 monotherapy, who are treated with the combination of ASTX727 plus olutasidenib. (Cohort B: IDH1-mutant HR-MDS) XVII. In patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) anemia: To assess the rate of 8-week and 24-week red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (RBC-TI) with olutasidenib, time to RBC-TI, rate of transformation to AML and rate of 1-year RBC-TI. (Cohort C: IDH1-mutant LR-MDS) XVIII. To estimate the frequency and severity of toxicities with olutasidenib. (Cohort C: IDH1-mutant LR-MDS) XIX. To estimate rate of cytogenetic response (in patients with baseline cytogenetic abnormalities) and IDH1 mutational clearance with olutasidenib and correlation with rate of HI. (Cohort C: IDH1-mutant LR-MDS) OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 cohorts. COHORT A: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 1: Patients receive ASTX727 orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-5 of each cycle and venetoclax PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with CR, CRh, or CRi after cycle 4 continue treatment cycles every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow biopsy/aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. ARM 2: Patients receive ASTX727 PO QD on days 1-5 of each cycle, venetoclax PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle, and olutasidenib PO twice daily (BID) on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with CR, CRh, or CRi after cycle 4 continue treatment cycles every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow biopsy/aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. COHORT B: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM 3: Patients receive ASTX727 PO QD on days 1-5 of each cycle and olutasidenib PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with CR continue treatment cycles every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow biopsy/aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. ARM 4: Patients receive ASTX727 PO QD on days 1-5 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without CR after cycle 6 may then cross-over to Arm 3. Patients with CR, as well as patients without CR but deriving clinical benefit after cycle 6 continue treatment cycles every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow biopsy/aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. COHORT C: Patients receive olutasidenib PO BID on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients deriving clinical benefit after cycle 6 continue treatment cycles every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo bone marrow biopsy/aspiration and collection of blood samples throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 6 months for up to 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
132
Undergo collection of blood samples
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Given PO
Given PO
Given PO
Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) + CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh) + CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) (Cohort A)
Will compare the MRD-negative composite complete response (CRc) rate between the two treatment arms to determine if older adults with IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with the triplet ASTX727, venetoclax (VEN), and olutasidenib have a statistically significantly higher MRD-negative CRc rate than patients treated with the doublet ASTX727 and VEN. CRc will be determined based on multiparametric flow cytometry.
Time frame: Up to 4 cycles post randomization (Cycles = 28 days)
Rate of CR (Cohort B)
Will include CR equivalent. Will compare the CR rate between the two treatment arms to determine if patients with IDH1-mutant higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) treated with ASTX727 plus olutasidenib have a statistically significantly higher CR rate than those treated with ASTX727 alone. Complete response will be determined using the modified International Working Group (IWG) 2023 response criteria.
Time frame: Up to 6 cycles post randomization (Cycles = 28 days)
Rate of hematologic improvement (HI) (Cohort C)
Will be determined using the IWG 2018 response criteria for patients with IDH1-mutant low risk-MDS treated with olutasidenib.
Time frame: Up to 6 cycles post randomization (Cycles = 28 days)
CR and CRc (Cohort A)
CRc will be defined as CR, CRh, or CRi. Both the CR rate and the composite CR rate will be determined for each treatment arm. The difference in rate between the two arms will be provided along with a 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Transfusion independence (Cohorts A)
Will report the difference in rate of transfusion independence between the two treatment arms along with a 95% confidence interval. Additionally, will report the duration of transfusion independence, defined as the time from randomization to transfusion dependence, with the corresponding hazard ratio and Kaplan Meier curve.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Event-free survival (EFS) (Cohort A)
Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to evaluate different definitions in EFS, e.g., patients who failed to achieve a CR, CRh, or Cri after four cycles of treatment will be censored at the time of randomization. Will utilize the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models to evaluate these time-to-event outcomes.
Time frame: From randomization until either a failure to achieve a CRc after four cycles of treatment, relapse, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Cumulative incidence of relapse (Cohort A)
A cumulative incidence function will be created and a cause-specific hazard approach will be utilized with the event of interest being relapse and the competing risk being death.
Time frame: From which a patient achieves a CR to the time of relapse, assessed up to 5 years
Early mortality (Cohort A)
Will be calculated as binomial distribution with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 30 and 60 days
Overall survival (OS) (Cohort A)
Will utilize the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models to evaluate time-to-event outcomes.
Time frame: From randomization to the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Incidence of adverse events (Cohort A, B, and C)
As per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine toxicity patterns. In addition, will review all adverse event data that is graded as 3, 4, or 5 and classified as either "unrelated" or "unlikely to be related" to study treatment in the event of an actual relationship developing. The incidence of severe (grade 3+) adverse events or toxicities will be described for each treatment arm, but will also be compared between the arms. Fisher's exact tests will be used to quantitatively compare the incidence of severe as well as specific toxicities of interest between the treatment arms and will graphically assess differences in maximum grades observed for toxicities between the arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Composite CR (Cohort B)
Will be defined as CR (or CR equivalent) + CR with lesser hematological recovery (CRL) (CR with unilineage recovery \[CRuni\], CR with bilineage recovery \[CRbi\]) + CRh, which will be determined by the IWG 2023 response criteria. The composite CR rate will be determined for each treatment arm. The difference in rate between the two arms will be provided along with a 95% confidence interval. Will also conduct an additional analysis to estimate the composite CR rate for patients who crossed over.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall response rate (ORR) (Cohort B)
Will be defined as CR (or CR equivalent) + partial response + CRL (CRuni, CRbi) + CRh + hematologic improvement, which will be determined by the IWG 2023 response criteria. The overall response rate will be determined for each treatment arm. The difference in rate between the two arms will be provided along with a 95% confidence interval. Will also report results stratified by Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (IPSS-M) score.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Transfusion independence (Cohort B)
Will report the difference in rate of transfusion independence between the two treatment arms along with a 95% confidence interval. Additionally, will report the duration of transfusion independence, defined as the time from randomization to transfusion dependence, with the corresponding hazard ratio and Kaplan Meier curve.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Duration of response (Cohort B)
Among patients who achieve a response (both composite response and ORR), duration of response will be defined as the time a patient first achieves a response until either progression or death. Only patients who achieve a response will be used for this analysis. Patients that withdraw early after achieving a response will be censored on their date of withdrawal. Patients who utilize alternative therapy won't be censored, but sensitivity analyses will be conducted. Will utilize the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models to evaluate these time-to-event outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Event-free survival (EFS) (Cohort B)
Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to evaluate different definitions in EFS, e.g., patients who failed to achieve a CR, CRh, or Cri after four cycles of treatment will be censored at the time of randomization. Will utilize the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models to evaluate these time-to-event outcomes. Additional planned analyses include reporting results stratified by IPSS-M score and estimating median EFS for patients that crossed over.
Time frame: From randomization until either a failure to achieve a CRc after four cycles of treatment, relapse, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival (OS) (Cohort B)
Will utilize the methods of Kaplan-Meier as well as Cox regression models to evaluate time-to-event outcomes. Additional planned analyses include reporting results stratified by IPSS-M score and estimating median OS for patients that crossed over.
Time frame: From randomization to the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) bridge rate (Cohort B)
Will report the difference in rate of rate of patients bridged to Allo-SCT between the two treatment arms along with a 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Transfusion independence (Cohort C)
For patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) anemia, will report the estimated rate of 8-week, 24-week, and 52-week RBC transfusion independence along with a 95% confidence interval. Additionally, will report the time to transfusion independence, defined as the time from randomization to transfusion independence, with the corresponding hazard ratio and Kaplan Meier curve.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Transformation to AML (Cohort C)
For patients with RBC-TD anemia, will report the estimated rate of transformation to AML along with a 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Cytogenetic response (Cohort C)
For patients with baseline cytogenetic abnormalities, will estimate the rate of cytogenetic response and provide a corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.