1. To assess whether radiotherapy alone is non-inferior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with respect to event-free survival and superior in reducing treatment-related nausea in low-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who achieve complete or partial response and undetectable serum EBV-DNA following induction chemoimmunotherapy. 2. To evaluate whether adjuvant capecitabine and immunotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves event-free survival compared to adjuvant immunotherapy in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with stable disease or detectable serum EBV-DNA after induction chemoimmunotherapy.
Recent trials have demonstrated that for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), the addition of immnotherapy to standard induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves event-free survival (EFS) (NCT03700476 and NCT03427827). However, current trials on immnotherapies lack specific biomarkers for risk stratification and adaptive treatment strategies. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is closely associated with the development of NPC. Cell-free EBV-DNA released by NPC cells can be detected in peripheral blood and has been strongly correlated with patient prognosis. Prospective clinical trials (NCT03855020 and NCT04907370) have confirmed that patients with undetectable EBV-DNA after induction therapy exhibit significantly better EFS compared to those with detectable post-induction EBV-DNA. Among low-risk patients with undetectable EBV-DNA after induction therapy, the 3-year EFS rate exceeds 90%. However, the combination of immunotherapy with concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy also leads to significant treatment-related toxicities, with 74% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore novel treatment strategies aimed at reducing toxicity in this patient population. Recent phase 3 multicenter randomized trials have demonstrated that de-intensification strategies omitting concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy significantly reduce treatment-related toxicities in both early-stage (NCT02633202) and locoregionally advanced NPC (NCT04907370), with reductions in grade 3 or higher adverse events by 29% and 11%, respectively. Among high-risk patients with positive EBV-DNA after induction therapy, even with the combination of immuotherapy, the 3-year EFS remains suboptimal, ranging from 65% to 80%. There is a critical need for treatment intensification strategies to improve outcomes in this group. A recently completed multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial (NCT02958111) demonstrated that adjuvant metronomic capecitabine (650 mg/m² twice daily) for one year following standard induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improved 3-year EFS from 75.7% to 85.3% in high-risk locoregionally advanced NPC patients, with a manageable toxicity profile. Therefore, the investigators propose the following scientific hypothesis: in low-risk patients who achieve complete or partial response and undetectable serum EBV-DNA following induction chemoimmunotherapy, radiotherapy alone can reduce the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, without reducing survival; in high-risk patients with stable disease or detectable serum EBV-DNA, adjuvant capecitabine and immunotherapy can improve survival.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
802
Radical radiotherapy of nasopharynx and neck
Adjuvant metronomic capecitabine (650 mg/m² twice daily) for one year
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Adjuvant Toripalimab (240mg day1, Q3W )
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
RECRUITINGEvent-free survival
The primary endpoint was event-free survival from randomisation to disease recurrence (locoregional or distant) or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population.
Time frame: 3 year
Incidence rates of vomiting as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
In the low-risk arm, the primary outcome included the incidence rates of vomiting (evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version 5.0).
Time frame: 3 year
Overall survival
The secondary endpoint include overall survivall from randomisation to death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population.
Time frame: 3 year
Locoregional relapse-free survival
The secondary endpoint include locoregional relapse-free survival from randomisation to local and/or regional relapse or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population.
Time frame: 3 year
Distant metastasis-free survival
The secondary endpoint include distant metastasis-free survival from randomisation to distant metastasis or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population.
Time frame: 3 year
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Acute and late treatment-related adverse events will be assessed by the CTCAE v 5.0(Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0).
Time frame: 3 year
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by RTOG/EORTC System
Acute and late treatment-related adverse events will be documented according to RTOG/EORTC System.
Time frame: 3 year
Patient's quality-of-life as assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30
The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3.0 questionnaires will be used to assess quality-of-life
Time frame: 3 year
Patient's quality-of-life as assessed by QLQ-H&N35 v1.0
Using Quality-of-Life Head and Neck 35 items (QLQ-H\&N35) version 1.0 questionnaires
Time frame: 3 year
Patient-reported tolerability as assessed by PRO-CTCAE v1.0
Tolerability was assessed from patients' subjective experience using PRO-CTCAE (version 1.0)
Time frame: 3 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.